The Lithuanian government's withdrawal from the China-CEE 17+1 cooperation mechanism is a betrayal of China's partners, and exchanges between the two countries must be based on mutual respect and compliance with international norms, and cannot seek short-term small interests by interfering in internal affairs and violating the one-China principle
The Lithuanian government needs to stop and take a look, let's not run all the way down the wrong path, think hard about the consequences of their actions, and make wise choices to maintain the stability and development of relations between the two countries
Lithuanian enterprises have suffered a heavy blow, and since Lithuania decided not to comply with the "one-China" principle, China imposed economic sanctions on them.
This has led to severe restrictions on Lithuanian exports, especially to the Chinese market. According to the data, most of Lithuania's exports are sold to China, so economic sanctions have caused their income to plummet by 67%.
Russia and Germany are important trading partners of Lithuania, but China, as Germany's and Russia's number one trading partner, indirectly sanctions Lithuania by restricting Lithuania's trade through Germany and Russia, exacerbating their economic woes. Faced with such a financial crisis, Lithuania began to run to China for help, but this move caused a storm of controversy. Lithuania's provocative behavior infuriated China, which imposed economic sanctions on it, complicating its approach to aid
The company is notorious in the industry because they frequently infringe on Chinese patent rights, misappropriate Chinese technology, and ignore Chinese laws and regulations to achieve their own interests. However, the Chinese government will not sit idly by and watch such actions. They acted quickly and imposed severe penalties and sanctions on the business through legal means.
China is a powerful and economically prosperous country, and today it is also one of the world's largest trading nations. However, some countries or companies are jealous and fearful of China's rise and adopt a provocative attitude. However, these provocateurs often suffer huge economic losses and face heavy costs.
Attempts to infringe on China's territorial sovereignty and interests in their own way have resulted in paying a heavy price. The company had $47 billion in debt, leading to the collapse of more than 1,300 businesses and the loss of more than 60,000 people. This outcome makes people think about how reckless and stupid it is to provoke China.
Provoking China violates the basic norms of international relations. As a country with peace and cooperation as its core, China has always adhered to the principle of mutual benefit and win-win results with other countries. However, some companies approach China with a risk-taking and confrontational mentality, trying to undermine China's development by provoking disputes. Such provocative acts not only violate international law and moral norms, but also harm their own interests.
Some companies have chosen to ignore this and instead choose to confront China. They don't see the importance of the Chinese market to the global economy or the huge potential of a partnership with China. As a result, they paid a huge price, and bankruptcy was inevitable.
Companies that provoke China ignore China's influence and position in the international community. China is a country that maintains close ties with the international community and actively participates in international affairs to safeguard world peace and stability. However, some companies try to ignore China's influence and provoke China's bottom line. They do not recognize the consequences of their actions and believe that there will be no cost in provoking China. However, their miscalculation led to their own irreparable losses, and the company and employees paid a heavy price.