The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Recently, the United States put forward a high-profile initiative at the United Nations General Assembly, calling on countries to jointly ban anti-satellite missile tests. This proposal has once again sparked discussion and heated discussions around the world. However, except for a few Western countries that support this, most countries are skeptical and critical of the US initiative, believing that there is an intention to strengthen unilateral military superiority behind it. Li Song, the mainland's disarmament ambassador, said even more bluntly that the irrationality of the US move lies in the fact that it only emphasizes restricting the behavior of other countries, but does not put forward any restrictions on its own mature anti-satellite missile technology.
From this incident, it is clear that the United States is worried and worried about the mainland anti-satellite missile. China's self-developed DN-2 anti-satellite missile has the ability to hit satellites at high speeds, thereby achieving strategic destruction and becoming an effective threat to US GPS systems and reconnaissance satellites. The U.S. military has repeatedly expressed concern about the severe restrictions that Chinese anti-satellite missiles could impose on its future military operations.
In response to the mainland's intensifying anti-satellite missile tests, the United States is not only making superficial appearances in international forums, but its army experts are also intensively studying in response to possible Sino-US war scenarios. Once GPS positioning systems and reconnaissance satellites are destroyed in wartime, the U.S. military will face the challenge of how to continue operations quickly and efficiently.
In the eyes of US military experts, the GPS system is the "eyes" of US military operations. Once this "eye" loses its function, the US military will lose important capabilities such as high-precision autonomous navigation, mobile command, and precision guided strikes. However, the lack of effective self-protection mechanisms for GPS systems in outer space in high-orbit has become the biggest concern for the U.S. military.
In response, U.S. Army experts drew on past combat experience against Iraq. On the battlefield in Iraq in 2003, the United States sent multi-domain reconnaissance forces to successfully dismantle Iraq's defense system through a high degree of cooperation between forward exploration, electronic reconnaissance and air strikes. However, unlike Iraq, China, as a large country, has heavily guarded coastal areas, making it difficult to penetrate into them.
Especially under the constraints of China's strong military defense line and modern weapons, it is almost impossible for the US military to try to infiltrate with the help of islands in the South China Sea. The PLA's anti-infiltration system will effectively suppress the activities of the US military. At the same time, China's air power is also sufficient to withstand American bombing attacks.
Summing up, the recommendations of US Army experts appear unrealistic in the current situation. For a big country like China, the traditional mode of warfare no longer applies. In the face of China's military power and powerful anti-satellite technology, the United States' multi-domain reconnaissance forces may be in trouble and struggle to achieve their intended goals.
Summary: The recent U.S. initiative to ban antisatellite missile tests has attracted international attention. However, most countries are skeptical about the intentions behind it. China's DN-2 anti-satellite missiles pose a threat to U.S. GPS systems and worry the United States. While U.S. Army experts have tried to learn from past experience, these moves may not work in the face of China's modernized military power. Therefore, defining war in conventional thinking is not realistic to solve current problems.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.