Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is convenient for you to discuss and share, and can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Take local materials in China, earn Chinese money, profit moves abroad, high! Is it legal to use the word China for the name Visual China?
Chai Jijun, male, Han nationality, born in April 1974 in Shanghai, bachelor degree.
Basic information Chinese Chai Jijun, date of birth, April 1974, nationality
Birthplace of China: Shanghai nationality, native of Shanghai, ethnic group, Han nationality, academic information graduation institution, bachelor's degree from Nanjing University
Biography
From August 1995 to March 2006, he worked as a photo editor and photojournalist of China Youth Daily;
In April 2000, he cooperated with his colleague Li Xueling to establish Photocome, the first Internet photo company in China;
On May 1, 2000, the Photocome website was officially operated, and Li Xueling named it "Photocome", which means "the picture is coming";
Since March 2006, he has served as the director and editor-in-chief of Beijing Hanhua Yimei Picture Co., Ltd.;
Since June 2012, he has served as the executive director and editor-in-chief of Huaxia Vision (Beijing) Image Technology Co., Ltd.;
Since April 15, 2014, he has served as Vice President and Editor-in-Chief of Visual (China) Culture Development Co., Ltd.;
Director of Visual (China) Culture Development Co., Ltd. since May 9, 2014;
He has been in office since April 27, 2016
Chai Jijun, founder of Visual China, said: The lack of copyright awareness of self-media is the biggest challenge at present, and it is also the biggest opportunity. Another problem is that the recent national emblem copyright problem is not very big, is that the current Chinese netizens are too sensitive, to make a very small and very small problem that can be solved into the current uncontrollable situation, Chinese netizens are too terrible.
Chai Jijun, founder of Visual China.
Our works are widely used, but we also face one of the biggest problems: they may not be downloaded from our website, but copied and pasted elsewhere. Now, there are tens of millions of WeChat public accounts, whose authors are not professional editors and know little about copyright laws. They don't know our website, but they know that there are good photos, which is a big challenge for us, but also a huge opportunity.
I found that the number of our customers went from thousands to millions.
The previous ideal car event is quite good at creating public opinion and pinching traffic, whether it is good or bad, ideal cars usually put traffic into their pockets, car stores do not know whether this is the ideal car deliberately or unintentionally, but from the current public opinion trend, the reputation of the ideal car began to be eaten back!
Ideal car sues ideal car film shop whether ideal car wants to create a bursting event or really for the so-called protection of their rights and interests, although it has obtained unprecedented traffic, but these flows almost do not support the ideal car, of course, recently you will see some unified remarks, as for why there is a big think about it!
Now Visual China also wants to replicate the ideal car?
Want heat or traffic? Has Visual China forgotten how the ideal car does to say good into bad? Say that the original good reputation is gone?
Warning Visual China understands something, and if it does not get this national emblem copyright issue right, it will only wait for destruction.
Who violated whose legitimate rights and interests? It should be very clear to the "visual" that focuses on copyright! I think this is definitely one of the most ridiculous and ugly events of the year. Their tone is really big enough! Are all the photos theirs? They took as many as 173 photographs taken by others without permission, and brazenly sued others for infringement. It's a scene of dark humor. Where does Visual China come from so many pictures of others? They probably spend most of their time using "crawlers" to scrape images from the web,
Then add their own labels so they can quietly include other people's work in their copyright library.
Dig and dig in the small garden, dig up an ant and trample it to death.
Digging and digging in the big garden, digging and digging, digging out a mouse and releasing it.
Dig and dig in the huge garden, dig and dig, dig out a poisonous snake and call it Mama.
Our national flag and emblem pictures are created and owned by a foreign company, and this porcelain is too big and outrageous.
Copyright and patents were the favorite things of Jewish capital, once monopolized and then lying to make money
The point is why are companies established by several foreigners called "Visual China", and on what basis do they put the national flag and emblem in them to make money? Who gave them the guts?
The consequences of the lack of supervision, as well as those companies that preemptively register trademarks in bad faith, should be strengthened in this regard, so that the fundamental problem can be solved.
Plug the "legal loophole" and prevent "touching porcelain" rights protection!
For this matter, what do netizens think about whether the copyright of the national emblem belongs to Visual China?
Leave your comments to share and discuss