Before reading this article, please click "Follow" to facilitate your discussion and sharing, bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
Text | Jiang Yan dye
Edit | River smoke dyeing
preface
With the opening up of reform, along with the progress of society, women's rights and interests are also increasing, and more and more women are gradually pursuing freedom of dressing.
Today's women are no longer restricted in clothing as in ancient times, and they show their unique style charm through different outfits and different accessories.
Some people no longer classify women's freedom to dress as showing personal charm, but through this so-called 'freedom to dress' women are objectified into commodities, so as to attract people's attention and obtain fame, fortune and money.
Those affected by the spread of the Internet also followed the trend and wore these clothes, which also made some netizens sigh: "I finally understand the true meaning of the Rakshasa Sea City written by Pu Songling, and the current people, as described in the Rakshasa Sea Market, generally live in the country where others are empty, are brainwashed by others, treated as commodities, and help that person speak." ”
Are these for freedom of dressing, or are they for the sake of creating a topic to attract attention? What exactly is freedom to dress?
Sexy does not equal exposure
With the development of the Internet, you can see the diversity of the world and the variety of life without going out, but at the same time, it also shows some controversial topics in front of everyone.
One of the most concerned is the topic of freedom of dressing, and people can see young ladies wearing suspenders that barely cover key parts on social platforms.
When someone questions this, a group of people will appear and say: "Summer is a little hot, you should wear cooler, what do you know?" Everyone has the freedom to dress. ”
And some netizens said: "Freedom of clothing does not mean exposure, this is simply not clothing." Disrespectful to social perception. ”
In 2019, there was an actress Reiza wearing a slip dress at the airport, and the street photo was on a hot search. The reason for the hot search is because the neckline of her suspender is too low, and some netizens also said on Weibo: "Does she have chest showing." ”
This matter is not an isolated case, and the costumes on this year's Burberry Spring and Autumn show are also hotly discussed.
The models were wearing either open-crotch pants or bare breasts. On this runway, the pants worn by the models completely exposed their panties and ass.
And their tops only have two ties to cover their private parts, so that many models also need to cover with their own hands.
After seeing such clothes and catwalks, many netizens questioned: "Isn't the role of clothes for us to cover our bodies?" Now the clothes can't even cover the body, this effect can't be done, so what use does he have? ”
I don't know why, the clothes are now more and more exposed, and even a young lady posted a video on social platforms saying: "I want to find a simple dress with an ordinary style, no back or chest, no split ends, no puff sleeves, and also said that I have not found it for a long time." ”
And under this video video, many netizens replied, some netizens said: "Me too, I too, I don't like to leak, I want to find a skirt like this, but I haven't found it, it's really strange." ”
Some netizens commented on this phenomenon: "Although people's minds are much more open than in the past, everyone does have their own freedom to dress, but the premise of this freedom should also be in line with the current scene, at least this clothes should not be clothed." ”
Think of those beautiful Hong Kong stars in the 8th and 90s, they wore slip bandeau dresses that would not make people feel exposed, only that they were sexy and beautiful.
And now it is obviously the same as before, wearing suspenders, but it is said to be exposed.
Just because these clothes are subconsciously considered to be 'edged' products, the clothing labeled as 'sexually suggestive' includes not only women's clothing, but also some children's clothing.
Child soft pornography
This kind of clothing is called 'milk hot style', this kind of clothing means that children wear not only sexy and mature, but also milky, look sexy and cute, and then cause a wide range of imitation to follow. The cause was that the mother of a four-year-old girl posted photos of her daughter dressed online.
The picture shows a little girl wearing a slip skirt and stepping on small leather shoes, and making some inappropriate poses in public.
In this regard, some people who support this kind of dress said: "The little girl dressed like this, the milk is hot and spicy looks good." ”
The opponents said: "It's not good to wear such sexy clothes for children, after all, there are still many bad people in this world, it is better to try to wear loose age-appropriate clothes for little girls." ”
Faced with the argument, the mother simply replied: "Everyone has the freedom to dress, and bad people do not choose the object of crime through clothing." ”
Often controversy is accompanied by heat, that is, in such a situation, the 'milk and spicy' style of dressing has become popular among children.
Later, some media reporters searched for the same children's dress of "Holding Hand Door" on the online shopping platform, and this skirt is not much different from the skirt worn by the news party, whether it is a décor style, splicing, etc.
You must know that since the "state-owned enterprise leaders 'holding hands' incident" in June, the dress worn by the woman involved has been called 'dismissal skirt' by netizens.
It is such a controversial dress, but it is used for children to wear, which makes people feel inappropriate. The reporter then asked the store customer service: "Do you think such a skirt is suitable for children?" ”
To this, some customer service replied: "Is there a problem with this dress?" Isn't he just an ordinary dress? ”
Some customer service humbly accepted this problem, and quickly reported that the wholly-owned page was removed from the shelves and replaced with another skirt.
After that, the reporter also contacted the relevant personnel of the online shopping platform to feedback the matter, and not long after, the dress was all removed from the online shopping platform.
This kind of thing is not an exception, there are many merchants, seeing business opportunities from the "milk and spicy wind", began to imitate, in their own online stores to hire some lesbians as models, shooting "sexy" clothing.
What's more, when shooting children's commercials, they also let children take some unspeakable poses and shoot from some inexplicable angles.
Although these children may not understand the meaning of these pictures, adults can see other intentions.
This behavior of 'sexualizing' children in the name of freedom of dressing attracted the attention of the whole Internet, and after that, these businesses also had to remove these videos and pictures.
The controversy caused by the freedom to dress, in addition to these "sexual innuendo", there are some clothes that are not in line with the scene at the time.
Out-of-place dressing
Each piece of clothing has a scene that suits the outfit, such as wearing a swimsuit by the beach, cosplay clothes at a comic convention, or a kimono in Japan, all of which are not controversial.
But some people took a different path and wore some clothes that did not fit the scene at that time.
On March 20 this year, a woman wearing a kimono took photos in Nanjing's Jiming Temple, which caused heated discussions on the Internet.
You know, Nanjing is a special place, it has been burned and plundered by Japan, and even 300,000 Chinese compatriots were killed by Japanese invaders, and this woman is wearing traditional Japanese clothes in such a place, it is really difficult not to cause heated discussions.
After seeing this incident, some netizens thought: "What clothes to wear in Nanjing is not good, but to wear a kimono, is it to forget that painful history?" ”
Some netizens believed: "It's just a piece of clothing, it's not a big deal, don't be morally kidnapped, you actually have the freedom to wear clothes, and there is no law that you can't wear a kimono." ”
In 2017, four young people wearing replica World War II Japanese military uniforms took a group photo in front of the Anti-Japanese War Memorial Hall in the Sihang Warehouse and posted it online.
It is necessary to know that the "Four Elements Warehouse Defense Battle" was part of the Battle of Songhu in the Mainland Anti-Japanese War, which marked the end of the Battle of Songhu, and it was in such a special scene that these people took photos here wearing the clothes of the invaders.
Similar photographs circulated on February 20, 18, of two men wearing replica World War II Japanese military uniforms at the Shaojiashan bunker.
As soon as this photo was released, it also caused a heated discussion on the whole network, you know, Shaojiashan is located in the northwest of Xiaolingwei, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, which is one of the main battlefields of the defense of Nanjing.
Some people argue for this phenomenon: "Everyone has the freedom to dress, and they don't do anything." ”
But more netizens believed: "This is an unpatriotic performance, and their behavior is no different from the traitors and traitors at that time." ”
Because of their behavior, in order to stimulate the eyeballs and disregard the feelings of the nation, they have greatly hurt the patriotic feelings of the broad masses of the people and violated the "Law of the People's Republic of China on Administrative Punishments for Public Security."
After receiving education from the police, they were placed under administrative detention in accordance with the law.
In addition to these, disrespect for history, wearing the clothes of the aggressor on the war site, there are also some people at someone else's wedding, eyeballs.
Some netizens shared some personal experiences on social platforms, on her wedding day, her husband's cousin wore a red Hanfu, did exquisite makeup and hair accessories, and entered with her classmates when the wedding was held.
At that time, the guests were looking back at the acquaintance of the wedding protagonists, but because of their entrance, the attention of the guests was focused on them.
This incident made the bride who had worked hard for a year a little unhappy, but they still disliked the children, afraid that the children would stain their skirts, and make a big fuss there, resulting in the scene getting out of control for a while, and finally the bride had an emotional breakdown, hiding in the bathroom and crying.
Everyone does have the right to dress freely, but it is also necessary to distinguish the occasion, wear the right clothes on the right occasion, and should not overwhelm the crowd.
epilogue
Freedom to dress is not an excuse for indecency, and we should also respect the culture and feelings of society and others while exercising our right to dress freely.
Moreover, it is written in article 44 of the Law on Administrative Punishments for Public Security that anyone who deliberately exposes his body in a public place and the circumstances are egregious shall be detained for not less than 5 days but not more than 10 days.
In other words, "deliberately naked body" and "egregious circumstances" are illegal and are no longer the category of individual freedom to dress.
Therefore, the scale of dressing should be within the general tolerance of society, and the dress should also be in line with the scene at that time.
If the dress of others conforms to the clothing and scale of the time, it is within the acceptable range of society, we should also maintain respect for this, should not slander others, personal attacks, and do not label others according to what they wear, and should understand and accept their difference.
After reading this article, please follow + comment, so that the remaining subsequent events have new developments that can be quickly followed