#Women's World Cup#Former England goalkeeper Rachel pointed out: "Vancegaard's header was brilliant, I expected Xu Huan to save, the only reason not to save was that Sevetsk interfered with her
author：Jason Sports Daily Miscellaneous Talk
#Women's World Cup# Former England goalkeeper Rachel pointed out: "Vancegaard's header was brilliant, I was expecting Xu Huan to save, the only reason not to save was that Sevetsk interfered with her. However, the referee thought the goal was valid. ”
Fortunately, the eyes of the fans and spectators are bright
I didn't expect such a penalty to exist in the World Cup!
Interfere with the goalkeeper, no replay!
Sorry, really sorry. The women's football girls work hard
but was treated unfairly#Headline Creation Challenge#
#Women's World Cup#Former England goalkeeper Rachel pointed out: "Vancegaard's header was brilliant, I expected Xu Huan to save, the only reason not to save was that Sevetsk interfered with her
#Women's World Cup#Former England goalkeeper Rachel pointed out: "Vancegaard's header was brilliant, I expected Xu Huan to save, the only reason not to save was that Sevetsk interfered with her
#Women's World Cup#Former England goalkeeper Rachel pointed out: "Vancegaard's header was brilliant, I expected Xu Huan to save, the only reason not to save was that Sevetsk interfered with her
#Women's World Cup#Former England goalkeeper Rachel pointed out: "Vancegaard's header was brilliant, I expected Xu Huan to save, the only reason not to save was that Sevetsk interfered with her
