In fact, rumors in the e-sports circle have been endless, but it is still rare to see rumors that have caused themselves to be dishonest and enforced.
Next, I will take a netizen who spread rumors about PDD fake competition as an example to explain to you how he became a dishonest executor step by step, that is, Lao Lai.
The thing is like this, netizens "Heart Bundle ※ Negative" posted in 2021 that the PDD team played fake matches in a very positive tone.
Then PDD sued, but netizens still did not care after receiving PDD's indictment, posting that "laughed at me to death"
Since the court temporarily changed the online hearing to an offline hearing, netizens are not ready to go to the Shanghai court.
And he felt that it was very simple for him to win the case, so he refused the lawyer's offer to charge for writing a reply and wrote a reply himself.
However, the court ruled that the netizen lost the lawsuit in absentia, and then awarded 20,000 yuan for mental damages.
Of course, netizens were not satisfied with filing a second lawsuit, demanding that PDD prove that mental impairment was due to their post.
Then the PDD side has the will to settle, as long as the netizens pay 3,000 within a month, and 10,000 within a year, the two sides can settle.
But netizens considered that two brothers who were also sued by PDD won the case, so he felt that he also had the victory. Of course, an out-of-court settlement was rejected.
Unexpectedly, the court of second instance ruled to apologize and compensate 30,000 yuan, and then the netizen had become a dishonest person because he refused to implement the compensation.
Basically, as long as there is money in personal bank cards and Alipay, it will be taken away by the court. And you can't take a high-speed rail plane, and the impact on your life is still not small.
Not only did this netizen not lose money, but his apology was only a superficial apology, but he was actually very unconvinced.
Of course, this matter is not over yet, netizens said that he will use the other two brothers' winning cases "same case and different judgments" as evidence to file a court retrial.
He even said that he would report the trial judge for favoritism and corruption.
To be honest, this buddy may still not know why he was prosecuted, if he does not have definite evidence, how can he say that the judge is favoritism, corruption, and bribery? So I feel that he really lost the case.