The Chinese Super League is halfway over, and the most interesting thing is not the favourites Shanghai Port, nor the relegation favourites Dalian Renhe and Qingdao Manatee. It's VAR and referees, almost every round is controversial, and as these two rounds continue to ferment, the referee issue is once again on the table. According to the "Football News" report, at the end of the Chinese Super League halfway, there have been 3 referees Wang Zhe, Tang Shunqi and Li Haixin who were suspended by the Football Association, and Wang Zhe was punished in the first round of the first round, and there was another penalty error in the 14th round of the Chinese Super League Taishan and Harbour matches, and the Football Association stopped the whistle silently and did not disclose it to the public!
The Football Association and the referee are already tacit to each other, wrong and punished, but not public, beautiful name rest adjustment!
The reason why the Football Association does not punish the referee is that the rules are interpreted differently?
The Chinese Super League has started the season in chaos and will be completed at the end of September. In addition to the anti-corruption and anti-gang sweep campaign in Chinese football, the purpose is to make way for the national football team to prepare for the Asian Cup and the World Preliminary Round, and the national team is larger than the league, which can only occur in the Chinese Super League. It also reflects to a certain extent the unprofessionalism and overlord clause of the Football Association, and the club only has the power to obey. Although the Football Association claims to have 252 referees and the Chinese Super League has 91 referees, in fact, the three divisions of the Football Association are played at the same time, and it is not easy to make up the Chinese Super League. Therefore, punishing the referee will not be a long-term suspension, just a few games. In fact, the Chinese Football Association's decision and the judgment understood by each club may be biased, so that many times the same foul is different for different referees. How can this convince the club?
Regarding the lack of communication between the Football Association and the clubs, there are many reasons, most of the teams involved in the anti-gang crime campaign, and the lack of staff within the Football Association. The new football association needs to officially start working after September, so in the transition period, a lot of things are eyebrows and beards!
The FA penalty is like a dragonfly point of water, the reason is the lack of excellent referee reserves!
Wang Zhe counted that this internal suspension has been punished for the second time, but he will soon be able to return. Referees including Tang Shunqi and Li Haixin have also had major controversial penalties, but within three rounds of the league, either referees or assistant referees reappeared on the field.
Doesn't the Football Association know that people are terrible? It is because there are few referees of this level, and it is difficult to professionalize referees, because how to solve the problem of treatment? The reason is still that there is not enough reserve of excellent referees, so every time the punishment is more like to transfer the contradiction, the big things are turned into small things, and the small things are turned into small things. As long as the team and fans stop causing trouble, settle and resolve. The referee is willing to accept the punishment, anyway, it does not affect the penalty later, because the football association is also unavailable, there is no way!
The club does not dare to complain, the rules of the football association are pits!
The relevant regulations of the Football Association are the system of referees not appealing, and the internal referee committee of the Football Association will deal with problems, which is the so-called silent punishment, which does not hurt the bones. This unwarranted complaint is the policy of the current Football Association for the Chinese Super League this season, and the real purpose is doubtful. Of course, Gao Hongbo was once the leader of this policy, and he should be blamed!
Is it to avoid risk, or is it to have some other purpose? Maybe it was originally distrustful of the referee, but there was no choice but to turn a blind eye, repeating the mistakes of the past!
In addition to saying that the referee itself has a limited level, the football association has not done a good job of supervision. Has there been any communication between the Football Association and the club? Why is the interpretation of the referee's decision inconsistent? The non-appeal system is even more bizarre and unreasonable!
Thanks for reading, give a follow!
@反光镜体育
#Summer Creation Contest#