A team suffered two consecutive VAR misjudgments in 4 days, which is unbearable for any team or any player. Shandong Taishan and Fellaini have suffered unfair penalties from VAR many times in two consecutive rounds, and the business ability of the Chinese Super League referee makes the Taishan midfielder unbearable. In the round of 14 against Harbour, VAR stepped in to cancel Fellaini's goal, which caused great controversy and even attracted the attention of overseas football, and a few days later, in the round of 15, Fellaini and Taishan suffered two VAR controversial penalties.
After the game, Fellaini posted on social media in a series of posts attacking two obvious VAR miscalculations. One of them was the Taishan attack, Henan defender Luo Xin defended Fellaini, the former used his big arm to knock the ball away when competing for a header, Fellaini immediately complained about the handball behavior in the opponent's penalty area, but neither the referee nor VAR said anything. Judging from the replay, although Luo Xin did not open his arms at that time, he did have a similar elbow swing, and the football did fly in the direction of his elbow swing. The penalty resulted directly in the Tarzans losing a chance to score from a penalty.
Fellaini issued a second shot, accusing VAR of not scoring when it was determined that the Tarzans' shot had crossed the goal line as a whole. Judging from the photos released by Fellaini, the ball should have crossed the goal line as a whole, but because the Chinese Super League does not have goal line technology, VAR checks whether it crosses the goal line, but due to problems such as angle and picture clarity, the suspected goal was not counted. In this case, Tarzan can only eat dumb again. Compared with VAR, which has subjective and technical limitations, objective and reliable gate technology is more worthy of being cited.
Fellaini praised the VAR of the Chinese Super League in the accompanying text, and the two penalties in a game were controversial, not even controversial, and judging from the comments and messages of overseas netizens and fans, most of them also believed that VAR was misjudged. Of course, there is no way to change the result now, but Judson killed the game in the second reading stage and let the Tarzans leave from the away with 3 points, otherwise a good ball for the Tarzans would be hacked again.
Of course, for this kind of thing, everyone has everyone's opinion, even the referee, some fouls are not clear judgments with unified standards, there must be referee and fan supervisor views, so the controversy is that no one can convince anyone, even if Fellaini issued these two controversial penalties, there will be many people who decide that there is no misjudgment. But since there is great controversy, should the football association and the referee give an interpretation of the dispute after the fact and conclude the dispute in an official form? This is really not good enough for today's football associations.