Street visits, which were previously a common method used by research institutions, were often conducted by the media, and this model has been carried forward and welcomed since the media era.
The reason why netizens love to watch this kind of street visit is that the views of ordinary people on these streets on certain people or things are relatively simple views in the eyes of the audience, with high credibility and can also represent part of the "public opinion".
Why put "public opinion" in quotation marks? That's because with the acceleration and popularization of information dissemination, some ordinary people's views will also be consciously biased, that is, the legendary "rhythm", and this kind of "public opinion" that has been brought through the rhythm is often quite far from the truth.
This article is not about a street interview, but a comment from an ordinary netizen, from the perspective of identity and environment, he is also equivalent to a "street interview" on the Internet, and his comments are indeed very representative.
The article commented by this netizen is an introduction to listening to Yunxuan's outdoor live broadcast, in this outdoor live broadcast, the audience enjoyed crosstalk, dance, pop songs, ditties and instrument solo and other programs, because the program is more exciting, the highest online audience reached 300,000 plus, and was also praised as the "Little Spring Festival Gala" by some netizens.
The entire comment of this netizen is about a hundred words, although it is very short, but it can be roughly divided into five paragraphs, let's analyze it paragraph by paragraph.
Really, red can't be, this false prosperity, last long.
This is an evaluation of Cao Yunjin's online teahouse listening to Yunxuan, and it can't be said to be right or wrong, because everyone's standard for "red" and "hold on" is different.
The flexible mode of Cao Yunjin's live broadcast room really makes some people unable to understand, whether it is the online "Quyuan Miscellaneous Altar" or "Variety Show Grand View", or the "Avenue of Stars"?
From the current development momentum, as long as Cao Yunjin can continue to do it, with the advantage of low cost of the live broadcast platform, coupled with the advantages of "co-creation" mutual drainage, I don't know how much it can develop, but it is not difficult to become a stable platform, the author believes that the final positioning of the online teahouse is more reliable than the online "variety show".
The netizen is not optimistic about listening to the evaluation of Yunxuan online teahouse, although it is different from the author, but at least now you can't say that the author is wrong or that he is wrong, after all, no one can predict the future.
Crosstalk, or dry goods.
There is nothing wrong with this, the biggest problem in the crosstalk industry now is the lack of "dry goods", Deyun Society's crosstalk was complained by netizens as "too much water and too broken", Cao Yunjin's crosstalk is very porcelain, but lack of innovation, hip-hop baggage shop, Qingqu Club, big comic crosstalk and other groups crosstalk innovation is good, but at present, there is still a lack of quality of course also lack of traffic.
However, there is still a problem with this evaluation, Cao Yunjin has long changed "online crosstalk teahouse" to "online teahouse", which is equivalent to "Quyuan Miscellaneous Altar" to "variety show grand view", you can no longer measure Cao Yunjin's live broadcast room with simple crosstalk.
How meaningful is it that you report the name of the dish, no matter how fast it is?
The author supports this view, and is not very optimistic about some traditional mouth-twisters, tongue twisters and other lip skills in crosstalk, which is really not very interesting.
For example, Li Yinfei's "Big Talk Lu Xun" has a Guankou composed of Mr. Lu Xun's works, which not only has skills but also content.
Of course, this evaluation also hopes that this netizen will post to Deyun Society fans, some Deyun Society fans especially like to tout their own artists' mouth, and then belittle other comedians will not pass through. You can't evaluate Deyun Society's good basic skills when you have a mouth, and it makes no sense to evaluate it when listening to Yunxuan come up with a better mouth, this kind of double-standard comment is unacceptable.
I have no malice towards you (Cao Yunjin), but I am speechless about your betrayal when Master fell into trouble, when you fell into the well and defected to the mainstream.
If the first three comments of the netizen were normal, this comment exposed one thing, in the matter of Cao Yunjin and Guo Degang, he was taken to the rhythm, in other words, his brain was washed.
In 2010, when the "August turmoil" of Deyun Society, Cao Yunjin did not quit the club, he left Deyun Society at the end of October, when Deyun Society had re-enacted, everything was calm before he left, not only did he not have the so-called "falling into the well", but accompanied Master and Deyun Society to share tribulations.
Perhaps because Cao Yunjin's withdrawal from Deyun Society and the "August turmoil" occurred in the same year, some self-media and netizens thought that Cao Yunjin also withdrew in August, which was seriously different from the facts.
It should be emphasized that neither side is responsible for Cao Yunjin's withdrawal from Deyun Society.
Cao Yunjin believes that the long-term cheap contract of Deyun Society is unfair, and chooses not to sign the contract, then naturally he can leave at any time.
Deyun believes that Cao Yunjin does not sign a contract and is unwilling to schedule shifts with the employees who signed the contract, so he simply does not let him continue to perform, which is of course not wrong.
Cao Yunjin and Deyun Society should belong to a peaceful breakup, whether it is from the traditional master-apprentice relationship of crosstalk or from the modern enterprise management system, there is no problem for both parties.
Therefore, the netizen said that Cao Yunjin's "falling into the well" has been suspected of rumor-mongering.
The more bizarre evaluation is "going to the mainstream", where does this evaluation come from?
It is his freedom where Cao Yunjin works after leaving Deyun Society, unless Deyun Society signs a "non-compete agreement" with him to pay him every month, otherwise Cao Yunjin has the freedom to choose his job.
After leaving Deyun Club, Cao Yunjin chose to start a business, register his own company, and then open Listening Yunxuan, and then publish books, three on the Spring Festival Gala, go on variety shows, act in film and television dramas, and open special shows, in those years it was a mess, luxury cars were bought, five-story villas were also bought, and they made a lot of money.
If Cao Yunjin chooses to work in the crosstalk group in the system, it is estimated that he really can't earn so much money, and if he stays in Deyun Society, with a basic salary of several thousand yuan a month and a few hundred income from a small theater, it is difficult to buy a good car, let alone buy a villa in Beijing.
If the Spring Festival Gala was considered "to the mainstream", then Guo Degang and Yue Yunpeng were also considered to have "joined the mainstream".
If it is said that the relationship with the actors in the system is considered "to go to the mainstream", then Guo Degang's master Hou Yaowen was the head of the rap troupe of the railway literary troupe before his death, his partner Yu Qian is an actor of the railway literary troupe, and Wang Huibai's Han Baoli is an actor of the Tianjin Quyi Troupe, which means that Guo Degang and his wife have both "defected to the mainstream"?
Therefore, the "rushing to the mainstream" in this netizen's comment is really incomprehensible, is it that in his cognition, as long as it is not Deyun Society, it is considered "mainstream".
Any excuse, any grievance, should not be like this
This means that no matter how much grievance Guo Degang gave Cao Yunjin, he could not work against Guo Degang.
The author strongly disagrees with this sentence, on the one hand, there is a double standard problem, for example, when Hou Yaowen was buried, Guo Degang ran to drink happy wine, his reason was "ashamed to share ceremonies with others", is this considered an excuse? Is this a grievance?
On the other hand, there is a standard problem, former Benshan Media employee Jiao Jiao has a sentence to the original unit quite reasonable: we should be grateful, the question is, who can tell me, what is the degree of gratitude? What are the criteria for gratitude?
Cao Yunjin should indeed be grateful to Guo Degang, but where is this degree and standard? If signing a ten-year cheap contract is gratitude, Cao Yunjin's single mother may not be able to live in a big villa in her life, is it unfair to Cao Yunjin's mother?
In the same way, Guo Degang should of course be grateful to Yang Zhigang, it was Yang Zhigang who arranged the first job in the system for Guo Degang, an 18-year-old junior high school dropout, not only taught him crosstalk and sketches, but even the screenwriter taught, Guo Degang himself publicly acknowledged Yang Zhigang's kindness, but where is this degree and standard? Whether Guo Degang has the final say or Yang Zhigang has the final say, this is the problem.
Therefore, we can neither kidnap Guo Degang with morality nor kidnap Cao Yunjin with morality, and we cannot kidnap anyone with morality. Guo Degang has a sentence to give to this netizen who wants to kidnap Cao Yunjin with infinite morality: "Do not persuade others to be good without suffering others."
To sum up, the reason why I deliberately took this netizen's comment as an example is because the comment is very representative and can represent a very large number of netizens who have been brought to the rhythm, and there are many netizens with similar views.
Remember the key point, the conflict between Cao Yunjin and Guo Degang occurred after he was cleared in 2016, and he launched a counterattack after being buttoned up with the big hat of "deceiving the sky and destroying ancestors, rebelling against human ethics", and I don't know how many netizens who say Cao Yunjin is a "judge" can withstand this historical level of public abuse.
In the final analysis, the fundamental reason why such netizens are led to the rhythm is still trapped in the "information cocoon", they are not even willing to spend thirty seconds on the Internet to search for the time when Cao Yunjin quit the Deyun Society, and their evaluation will naturally be biased.
Today, when network information is so popular and convenient, these netizens still evaluate Cao Yunjin with views that are seriously contrary to the truth, you can imagine how serious the similar situation has been in the past ten years, and you can imagine how much grievance Cao Yunjin has suffered over the years.