The thousand-year-old capital, Luoyang, Henan, is worthy of being the capital of many dynasties, and there are many strange things...
Recently, another strange and outrageous thing happened in Luoyang, Henan, the old man pedaled a tricycle to sell vegetables, worked hard for a day to sell 198 yuan, made a profit of 21 yuan, and was detained by the sampling department before he had time to close the stall, and was fined 110,000!
The image originated from the Internet and has nothing to do with the event
110,000 yuan, what is this concept?
Ordinary people earn 5,000 yuan a month, an annual salary of 60,000 yuan, and they can earn 110,000 yuan for nearly 2 years without eating or drinking, which is not a small amount, even if a small company takes it out, it has to hurt, not to mention an old man who pedals three rounds of selling vegetables? Earn 21 yuan a day, I am afraid that I will not be able to pay a huge fine of 110,000 yuan in my life!
So the question is, why did the sampling department fine him 110,000 yuan?
It is reported that the old man, surnamed Jiang, bought a cartload of vegetables from a large wholesale market in Luoyang, including green onions, ginger, garlic, green peppers, spinach and the like, which looked excellent, but no one expected that these vegetables had the problem of "excessive pesticide residues".
During the sampling by the administrative authorities, it was found that the vegetables sold by the old man had the problem of "excessive pesticide residues", so they made an administrative penalty decision to fine the old man 55,000 yuan and add a fine of 55,000 yuan, and applied to the Western Engineering Court for compulsory enforcement.
Please note that the fine of 55,000 yuan and the fine of 55,000 yuan can be seen that the old man's circumstances are bad!
But think about it, the booth is very small, the scale is very small, it is just a small tricycle, the sales volume is very low, the profit is very low, only 21 yuan is earned.
Whether from the perspective of scale, profitability, or "criminal circumstances", the old man's plot is not bad, how can he be doubled and fined?
The image originated from the Internet and has nothing to do with the event
Fortunately, there were people in the Western Engineering Court, and the judge thought that this was inappropriate!
Although Jiang's stall does have the problem of "pesticide residues exceeding the standard", the old man is breaking the law for the first time, and it is not intentional, coupled with the active cooperation of people in the investigation, it has not caused much harm, so it should be punished lightly, and a double huge fine is obviously inappropriate!
Unfortunately, the two sides could not reach an agreement, especially the sampling department was unwilling to compromise, insisted on a fine of 110,000 yuan on the old man, and applied to the court for enforcement twice in a row, vowing to take out 110,000 from the old man's pocket, but the court stood firm and rejected the application of the sampling department, insisting on a lighter punishment for the old man.
After the matter was exposed, the Xigong Court was strongly praised by netizens, taken seriously, fair and just, reasonable, and did not lose temperature, on the other hand, the sampling department, it was really a scolding, all of them were scolded as "vampires" and "robbers"!
Facts have once again proved that the eyes of the masses are snowy, and who is really doing things for the people, the people are clear in their hearts, they are not confused at all, they will not forget in their hearts, and they will not show mercy in their mouths.
In this incident, there were 3 errors in the sampling department that need to be corrected in the future!
1. The punishment is too heavy and lacks flexibility
The vegetables sold by the old man have the problem of "excessive pesticide residues", should they be punished? Of course it should be punished, but you need to pay attention to proportion!
The sampling department has its own set of punishment plans or regulations, whether it is a plan or a regulation, I believe that it must not be dead, but alive and flexible.
There is no reason why a large company makes a profit of 2 million 100,000, and a small land stall makes a profit of 200 yuan and is also fined 100,000, right?
There is no reason to fine 100,000 for the first crime, and 100,000 for the tenth crime, right?
I believe that the plan must be flexible, for enterprises with large profits, it must be strictly implemented, and the punishment can be severe, and for the stalls with small profits, the punishment can be lightened, especially the old man, a small stall with a profit of only 21 yuan, and it is also the first "crime" without subjective intention, it should be punished lightly, and even verbally warned, if there is a repeat offense, it is not too late to punish.
A profit of 21 yuan and a fine of 110,000 yuan, it is unreasonable to say that it breaks the sky? It's cruel!
The fine is 5,238 times the profit, according to this ratio, if you change to a vendor who makes a profit of 100,000 yuan, won't you have to pay a fine of 500 million? This is simply not realistic!
Punishment must be punished, but it is necessary to master the proportions and grasp the strength, otherwise it will give people a feeling of "robber", I believe that our system is not like this, but it is used by someone wrong.
The image originated from the Internet and has nothing to do with the event
2, know the mistake and do not change, break through the south wall
Profit of 21 yuan, fine of 110,000, this is obviously mistaken!
As the saying goes, knowing mistakes can be corrected, good is great, I am afraid that some people will not correct their mistakes, do not see the coffin and do not shed tears, in this incident, the sampling department obviously made such a mistake.
The Xigong Court has clearly pointed out that the fine is improper, the punishment should be lightened, and mediation has begun, but the sampling department has been uncompromising, and has twice let the court enforce it, must fine others 110,000 yuan, this is not a road to the black what?
There are some negligence in the work, it is inevitable, I want to believe that this is an oolong caused by someone's negligence, but from the attitude insisted by the sampling department, this is not an oolong, this is the "justice" they have always insisted on.
Compared with making mistakes, what is more terrifying is not to know the mistakes and not to change, if not for the Western Engineering Court to adhere to the truth, the consequences will be unimaginable, once the court enforces it, what will happen to the old man who buys vegetables? Ruined family, or family ruin, I dare not imagine!
Let us once again praise the Western Engineering Court for upholding the truth and serving the people wholeheartedly!
3. The direction of punishment and strictly investigate the source
Treating the symptoms but not the root cause, can never be cured, the treatment of diseases is so, and the same is true of the problem of pesticide residues!
Where does pesticide residue occur? It must have happened on farms, it must have happened in large wholesale markets, and it was they who caused the problem of excessive pesticide residues, not the hawkers.
If you want to completely eradicate the problem of excessive pesticide residues, you need to investigate from the source, and punish them heavily, kill chickens and monkeys, kill a hundred people, and solve the source problem, and the small stall vendors naturally do not have the problem of excessive pesticide residues.
The image originated from the Internet and has nothing to do with the event
On the contrary, let the source not ask, stare at the vendors all day, how strict can it be? What about fines and more money? It still can't solve the problem, and the problem of excessive pesticide residues still exists.
Vendors with flowing water, pesticide residues beaten with iron, this is not a good phenomenon!
The above 3 questions, I hope that the sampling department can seriously think, keep improving, serve the people, and need to have strength without losing temperature!
(End of article!) ）