The return of mobile phones to removable batteries is inevitable The advancement of technology is removable
Two days ago, the European Parliament passed the agreement on the New Battery Law with 587 votes in favor and 9 against. I also brought you an article for the first time "The removable battery of the mobile phone is about to return, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, don't be led by Apple anymore", but many people expressed brainless support for the non-removable mobile phone, I personally think this is the regression of technology.
The most noteworthy point of the new battery law agreement is that for electronic products, all batteries in consumer electronics should be dismantled and replaced by users, including the mobile phone products that we use the most in our daily life, in other words, mobile phone removable batteries may return in Europe.
In the early years, Apple did create a precedent for smartphones and won worldwide attention. But do today's Apple phones have a big advantage in design? Isn't the screen-to-body ratio, telescopic camera, under-screen fingerprint, 100 million pixels, etc. carried forward by domestic manufacturers? So, why should we continue to insist on using the mobile phone design set by Apple 15 years ago? This is extremely unreasonable!
The European Union and the United States have both had regulations saying that future mobile phones should return to detachable design, so as to meet the principles of environmental protection and reuse, and the maintenance will be more transparent, and will not let manufacturers have time to drill. Domestically, not long ago, many people suggested that the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology cancel the design of removable batteries, which is a good thing.
A friend said that your removable battery design is not waterproof, but how about the utilization rate of waterproof functions? Is it falling into the water every day or soaking in it every day? Of course, it cannot be said here that removable battery = 0 waterproof, daily spill resistance will still be there. To be honest, I haven't been in water in all these years of using my phone.
So my personal humble opinion, as long as it is not deliberate, in fact, the mobile phone is not necessary to make IP68 at all.
From the data, the waterproof level of 5 can eliminate the harmful effect on the water flow of the nozzle spray in all directions, and the daily splash water is enough, and this waterproof level, even the removable battery design can do.
Therefore, the removable battery mobile phone design is equal to not waterproof This itself is a sick sentence, can only say that the non-removable design allows users to throw the phone into the water to soak, of course, I believe there are not so many users with problems.
Some friends said that fast charging is not better than universal charging?
Even if it is a fast 120W fast charge, it takes close to 20 minutes to fully charge, which is still a theoretical peak. This means that during this period you have to turn off the phone and wait 20 minutes.
I admit that this technology is very powerful and very helpful for users, but even if it is a fast charging speed, it is not faster than the battery replacement back then, right?
Combined with the bill passed by the European Union not long ago, it is only a matter of time before the mobile phone returns to the removable battery, and Apple brings out the "crooked road" There is no need for us users to get used to it, as a domestic mobile phone manufacturer, this time should stand up to break this anti-human design.
(8234106)