Recently, various revelations about Xiao S have emerged endlessly, on June 25, Xiao S's husband Xu Yajun was also exposed to a message that when he and Xiao S attended a party, he was actually fed unknown drugs by Xiao S, fortunately, he saw in time and avoided trouble.
However, Xu Yajun was also angry enough and used domestic violence again.
Xiao S and Xu Yajun have been married for so many years and already have three baby daughters, if it were not for the frequent rumors of the man's cheating, and the rumors that the two were not on good terms, the man would let the woman hang the lottery, they would be a warm family model that many people envy.
So, is the feeding of unknown drugs to Xu Yajun for the purpose of revenge?
Previously, when Wang Xiaofei and Da S were not divorced, once, Wang Xiaofei celebrated her birthday, and Xiao S was suspected of feeding drugs to her sister Da S.
At that time, Wang Xiaofei was still angry and asked her sister-in-law, "What did you put in the big S water?" ”
Xiao S did not respond, and Wang Xiaofei asked Da S angrily, "What did she give you to drink?" Big S was also silent.
In the end, Wang Xiaofei, who didn't ask a reason, left angrily.
Judging from this scene, the theory of retaliation is obviously untenable.
Some netizens also said that Xiao S should do this in order to control her husband and let him reduce those behaviors that are not conducive to family harmony, but the methods are too extreme.
As soon as the news came out, Xiao S was not as resolute as his attitude towards Ge Siqi, but chose not to respond together with Xu Yajun.
Years ago, Xiao S filed a lawsuit against a weekly magazine calling the party she and Aya were attending a "shaking head party."
Of course, in the face of photos that are not low in sharpness, Xiao S wants to sue for slander or slander, which obviously will not be supported, and she eventually won the lawsuit and received compensation because of her lawsuit for invasion of privacy.
The right to privacy is indeed a legal right that everyone should have, but the enjoyment of this right must not be used as an umbrella for certain behaviors, but should be enjoyed within the scope stipulated by laws and regulations. What do you think?
