The topic of artificial intelligence has been a hot spot that the market has been paying attention to since 2023.
On the whole, a group of people are wary of AI applications, fearing that the day when technology will get out of control, and require restrictions on AI technology; Another group of people has a positive attitude towards artificial intelligence, believing that artificial intelligence is mostly beneficial to humans, even if it impacts the jobs of some people, it will also generate new jobs.
Although artificial intelligence technology has made breakthroughs, it is still in the early days, and it is difficult to draw conclusions about the impact of AI on human beings, and it is even more difficult for us to give an objective and fair judgment on the above two views.
For the vast majority of people, it is more concerned about whether their jobs will be replaced by machines.
Let's first look at an experiment where someone tested ChatGPT with a senior high school paper, and the answer was that the text and programming subjects scored very high, and only zero in physics.
In this way, some observers believe that the application of AI in the field of physics may be difficult to replace, which is obviously biased, because the current ChatGPT cannot represent more mature AI in the future, but the current lack of input more data and information, but also means that the replacement may be more difficult.
Li Daokui, dean of the Institute of Chinese Economic Thought and Practice at Tsinghua University, recently said that the essence of accounting is the "sensor" of the economic system, which provides the basis for scientific decision-making for decision-makers in social and economic development, and ChatGPT can never replace accounting.
We might as well make such a summary and induction, the language model represented by ChatGPT can first replace the field of language and programming, because these are based on the summary of inherent knowledge.
Accounting, on the other hand, exists dynamically, and the latest data information cannot be found in historical experience. Of course, if the accounting data is entered into the system and analyzed and compared, the advantages of AI will be reflected again.
Based on these cognitions, it can basically explain the current speculation in the A-share market, and the media category is the most hyped, because the industry benefits the most, followed by the game, film and television industries. In other sectors, few AI application concepts are continuously sought after by funds.
When we come to this point, it is inevitable that we will think about one group, and that is writers.
Science fiction writer Liu Cixin thinks that "sooner or later, artificial intelligence can replace science fiction writers or other writers." Some observers call it "pessimistic attitude", and if you observe it from the perspective of a "science fiction writer", it is precisely "optimism", which is optimism about the development of science and technology.
Of course, science fiction writers are more likely to be "blindly optimistic" about the development of science.
Idle Finance believes that artificial intelligence will definitely be able to write some novels in the future, and even a group of well-known "virtual writers" will appear. Based on our current understanding of artificial intelligence, AI can only be processed in the old knowledge system, and it is difficult to appear so-called "innovation".
For virtual writers, it cannot simply be understood that way.
After eliminating the self-awareness of AI, this AI writer will not appear out of thin air, or need a person to transmit his ideas to AI for creation, which means that if you want to create an excellent "virtual writer", there must be a real person with fantastic ideas behind it.
Coincidentally, the financial world has also begun to stir.
A private equity firm announced that AI would manage a fund independently, which sounds not only magical, but also very new. The logic behind it is actually the same as that of "virtual writers", where researchers transmit their ideas to artificial intelligence, which then allocate assets.
At the end of the day, whether a virtual writer can become famous, and whether an AI-managed fund is excellent, depends on the person behind it. At present, from the perspective of information, artificial intelligence is not omnipotent, it is just a tool.
In particular, it should be emphasized that such a good fund manager as Buffett, artificial intelligence is irreplaceable, and the reason behind this is still based on a person's perception of the market.
Through the summary of the above multiple cases, it is not difficult to conclude that artificial intelligence does have an impact on our lives, but it is not a flood beast, once it has an impact on our careers, turning around and actively embracing AI will be another situation.