laitimes

Armenia ceded land to Azerbaijan for peace, and this is what the leaders of the color revolutions came to power did

author:Military intelligence writer Chen Xi

At the summit of the Eurasian Economic Union, Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan announced that Armenia and Azerbaijan have agreed on mutual recognition of territorial integrity.

Pashinyan noted that on this basis, the Asian-Azerbaijani side has made good progress in coordinating relations between the two countries, and he hopes that the Azerbaijani side and the Nagorno-Karabakh side will soon start normal and constructive dialogue.

Azerbaijani President Aliyev put it more bluntly.

He said that the Asian-Afghan peace agreement was able to reach a peace agreement because the Albanian side has no territorial claims to Armenia, and moreover, Armenia officially recognizes the Nagorno-Karabakh region as part of Azerbaijan.

This is the basis of the peace agreement, Armenia recognizes Nagorno-Karabakh as Azerbaijan, the territorial dispute between the two sides will not exist, and a peace agreement will naturally be reached.

Armenia ceded land to Azerbaijan for peace, and this is what the leaders of the color revolutions came to power did

(Nagorno-Karabakh conflict)

Pashnyan seems to have taken Nagorno-Karabakh as a hot potato

Judging by Pashnyang's statements, it seems that he treated Nagorno-Karabakh as a hot potato.

Cutting the land and seeking peace is already humiliating in itself.

Pashinyan not only announced in public, but also expressed his hope that the Azerbaijani side and the Nagorno-Karabakh side will start a dialogue as soon as possible.

It seems that Pashinyan is in a hurry to throw the Nagorno-Karabakh region out in order to draw a line completely.

In this way, Armenia will no longer have to struggle with the Nagorno-Karabakh issue.

What troubles there are, it has nothing to do with Armenia.

This can indeed be cleaned up, but considering that Armenia has been claiming Nagorno-Karabakh as part of it and is now eagerly throwing it out, this attitude is really embarrassing.

Armenia ceded land to Azerbaijan for peace, and this is what the leaders of the color revolutions came to power did

(Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan

Pashnyan came to power through color revolutions

Pashnyan came to power by protests, and this is the usual method of the West - color revolutions.

During the protests, Pashinyan's anti-Russian stance was exposed.

Russian-Asian relations, which were originally good, had huge problems after Pashinyan came to power.

Instead, a large number of Americans entered Armenia.

However, during the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the United States directly ignored Pashnyan and had no choice but to find Putin.

It is said that the frequency of calls between Pashinyan and Putin at that time reached once a day.

In the end, Russia sent peacekeepers to forcibly stop the Asian-Afghan conflict.

After Pashnyan led Armenia to defeat, it was opposed by the people of the country, and it was also thanks to the Russian army that Pashinyan stabilized his situation and could even continue to serve as the prime minister of Asia until now.

Now Pashnyan has slowed down, made peace, and then plans to withdraw from the CSTO.

Looking at this posture, it seems that anti-Russia is about to begin again.

Armenia ceded land to Azerbaijan for peace, and this is what the leaders of the color revolutions came to power did

(Leaders of the three countries of Russia and Asia)

Can the Ukrainian issue be solved in the same way?

Russia, as the mediator of the Asian-Afghan conflict, Putin commented on the current situation, saying that all three sides believe that obstacles can be overcome, and these are technical issues.

So, is the way of Armenia seizing land and seeking peace applicable to the Ukrainian issue?

It can only be said that a template is indeed provided, but it is almost impossible to use this template for the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.

Ukraine has repeatedly stressed that it will not give up any territory.

Although there are also some voices of peace talks in the West, the United States tends to freeze the conflict and let Russia and Ukraine ceasefire.

Whoever controls how much land will control it, but neither side will recognize defeat and, naturally, the other's sovereignty claims.

In the final analysis, the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan is completely different from the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

It's not realistic to want to solve it in the same way.

In addition, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict began in 2020, and a ceasefire agreement was reached that year, but until now, the problem has not been completely resolved.

The Russian-Ukrainian conflict is larger in scale, and the time required to completely solve the problem will probably increase exponentially.

Read on