Why is it said that Chinese is not the sixth "hieroglyph"
On page 39 of the Oracle Bone Dictionary (deciphering), it says: "Zhou Jinwen's Zhongyi 'There is a Han*
*Prefecture' is the later State of Jianghan. I can't help but ask if there is any basis for such a claim? This is directly put"
A judgment that is viewed as a "旂".
"Zhong" and "旂" are not very subtle differences, but there are obvious differences in connotation. Look at it."
It's a bit like "旂" saying that this is the pictogram of "旂", which is a very naïve judgment.
If"
It is "旂", which should be able to witness in other aspects. Without other testimony, it can only be a conjecture, or a hypothesis. Evidence without links cannot be corroborated as evidence, but at best a valuable but dubious reference.
From the glyphs, the "flag" is written on page 265 of the Golden Dictionary"
","Medium" written on page 24 of the Golden Dictionary"
There is a clear difference between the two words.
Looking at the "Explanation of Words" from the literal meaning, it is said: "'
'There are many bells, so that the multitudes will also be. From'
'Boom. ”
And the "Explanation of Words" believes: "In the middle, the inside also." From the mouth 丨, down to the top also. ”。
In the eyes of the ancients:
The gap between "medium" and "medium" is very large, and there is no possibility of misidentification and misunderstanding.
Some philologists confuse "旂" with "prayer".
Kang Yin analyzed "旂" and "pray" into the same word in his article "A Brief Analysis of the Origin and Flow of Words": "'
'Save the complicated'
' shape. Seals are divided into numbers. The banner has a multitude of bells to make the crowd. ’。 Seal Province'
’。 To show the society, to show the gods of the society. ‘
'or'
’... Sound saving. ”。
Although we do not agree with Kang Yin's "blackmail province" theory, we respect such a view. Maybe''
'For the beginning of the book'. Judging by the shape, this possibility exists.
Even if you put it"
"As a "旂" or even "
"The first text. It is also difficult to put "Han*
*Prefecture" is equated with "Later Jianghan Prefecture".
If you read the records of the "Chronicle of Puzhou", you will know that since 201 BC (the sixth year of Gaozu of the Western Han Dynasty), Puchun County was established, after 47 AD (the twenty-third year of the Eastern Han Dynasty Jianwu), the name was changed to Puyang in 378 AD (the third year of the Eastern Jin Dynasty), in 486 AD (the fourth year of southern Qi Yongming), the name was changed to Qichang, in 598 AD (the eighteenth year of the Emperor Suikai) the county was restored, and in 1376 AD (the ninth year of Ming Hongwu) it was set up as a county, and the county was re-established. That is to say, the age of the name "Puzhou" is too different from the age recorded in "Zhou Jinwen's "Zhonglu"" (周金文). This kind of nonsense crossing is by no means an honor for scholars who pay attention to research.
蕲, a cress, 蕲春 means the spring of bracken. According to liu bozhuang's "Records of Place Names" of the Jin Dynasty, "Pu chun is named after the water kuma multi-spinach (water celery)". The Northern Song Dynasty Music History "Taiping Huanyu Chronicle" inherits its sayings. The specialties of "Puzhou" are bamboo, wormwood, turtle and snake, which is known as the "Four Treasures of Puchun". This has nothing to do with either "flag" or "medium".
In ancient times, there was the name "Zhongzhou". Henan Province was called "Zhongzhou" in ancient times, also known as Middle-earth and Central Plains. The area centered on Luoyang. In addition, there is the existence of "Hanzhong City". Since there is a choice, the determination needs to be more evidence-
"'Hanzhong City' is located in the south of the Qinling Mountains, north of Daba Mountain, and the upper reaches of the Han River. As early as the Shang Dynasty, it was already known as "Hanzhong". 'Hanzhong' once became a place of contention for soldiers, such as Liu Bang, Zhuge Liang, etc. all used 'Hanzhong' as a military base. ”。 In ancient times, "state" and "county" had some of the same concepts, and "city" is a more modern concept.
Then 'Han'
Is 'state' the modern "city of Hanzhong"? Or is it referring to the "Zhongzhou" of the Han Dynasty? Or is it the "Puzhou" between Jianghan and Han? Clear-eyed people have their own choices. Even if it is considered to be consistent with Tang Lan's statement, having a view that is consistent only indicates that there is a same view. This does not mean that this view is necessarily valid or correct.