laitimes

Interpretation of the basketball association's heavy fine: "negative game" retains face, and the punishment basis of 4 people is confusing

On April 17, Beijing time, according to the official social media of the Chinese Basketball Association, the results of the Shanghai men's basketball team and the Jiangsu men's basketball team's playoff G3 survey results were officially released, and the specific screenshot is as follows:

Interpretation of the basketball association's heavy fine: "negative game" retains face, and the punishment basis of 4 people is confusing
Interpretation of the basketball association's heavy fine: "negative game" retains face, and the punishment basis of 4 people is confusing

For this result, in fact, the punishment is unprecedented, not only directly deducting 5 million funds, but also directly canceling the results of the 2-23 season, Jiangsu has been out is not much of a problem, Shanghai is meant to directly send Shenzhen to the final four, from the qualitative point of view of Shanghai's tacit agreement, they obviously lost their wife and broke the army.

However, from the perspective of the basketball association's fine, when it comes to specific penalties, it is obvious that it is a face-preserving role, and there is no "match-fixing" and "tacit ball" interpreted by outside fans, but is characterized as a "negative game".

Interpretation of the basketball association's heavy fine: "negative game" retains face, and the punishment basis of 4 people is confusing

After all, the final result of the negative game is that Shanghai played 3 games, and they tried to make the blood cloth come back as soon as possible, and Jiangsu also won a game at home, although there were many controversial voices after the game, but from the result, it was obvious that the two sides reached a consensus, rather than a simple negative game.

Interpretation of the basketball association's heavy fine: "negative game" retains face, and the punishment basis of 4 people is confusing

In the punishment of the basketball association, the head coach + general manager of Shanghai and Jiangsu was also punished differently, respectively, Li Chunjiang was fined 5 years, and Li Nan was fined 3 years? On the general manager's side, why Shi Lingjie 5 years and Jiang Yusheng 3 years? It's all negative matches, what is the difference between the 4 people?

If the severity of the penalty is actually the same for the two teams, but at the individual level, it may be directly related to the club's management model. First of all, on the Jiangsu side, Shi Lingjie and Li Nan basically belong to the state of joint management, and the game footage can be seen that the two often sit together, and even this game is treated negatively, and the last moment shot is frequently given to Li Nan and Shi Linjie.

Interpretation of the basketball association's heavy fine: "negative game" retains face, and the punishment basis of 4 people is confusing

Jiang Yusheng, the general manager of the Shanghai men's basketball team, rarely appears in the public eye, perhaps directly related to Shanghai's sound management model, and in this qualitative punishment, perhaps Li Chunjiang is one of the leaders.

Therefore, in this public punishment of the basketball association, in fact, the details that are really given to the outside world are relatively few, but more like the punishment results announced by the outside world after the internal punishment, rather than really putting the details in front of the fans, as much as possible to protect the brand of the CBA company, after all, the next 8 round of battle, excluding Shanghai and Shenzhen, and 3 important matchups, worthy of further attention from fans and the media.

cba

Read on