In the past few years, Laomei has used chip technology to open a "bullying" mode, especially for Chinese companies. Including but not limited to Huawei, SMIC, Hikvision and other enterprises, they have been suppressed by the United States. Biden believes that as long as Chinese companies are restricted from obtaining advanced chips, they can consolidate the hegemony of Meixin and continue to continue "hegemonism".
Obviously, Lao Mei's approach has not only caused dissatisfaction among many technology companies, but also been bombarded by Bill Gates. The old United States' suppression of Chinese companies has a high-sounding reason - to protect the safety of American companies. But in fact, this is just a "small move" by the old United States to prevent China from having great chips, and everyone with discerning eyes knows it.
Bill Gates believes that if you really don't want China to rise in the chip field, why should you wake up Chinese companies in advance? Isn't this a grass scare snake, giving them the opportunity to lay out and fight back in advance? In his opinion, Biden's approach is stupid, not only can not prevent the rise of Chinese companies, but will accelerate China's ownership of its own chips, thereby cutting off the business of Meixin companies shipping to the Chinese market.
Objectively speaking, Bill Gates is right, the reason why "China Core" can grow rapidly in just a few years is thanks to the impetus and reminder of Lao Mei, it is worth mentioning that Lao Mei's suppression of Chinese companies has also sounded the alarm for other chip companies. Recently, TSMC's attitude towards the United States has also changed, and after the United States revised the content of the chip bill, its CEO Liu Deyin called Biden in the air and is considering giving up the application for subsidies. The implication is that if you don't take your money, you don't have to rely on people.
It is worth mentioning that after TSMC "turned its face", other chip companies also opened the "storm" mode, Samsung, SK Hynix and other Hanxin giants, have also expressed their attitude, or no longer apply for subsidies. This is the multi-bone card effect, which can't be stopped at the beginning, and the small events that have been underestimated by the United States may lead to a series of chain reactions and immeasurable consequences.
In fact, after the past three or four years of games, chip-related companies have basically sobered up, and the US "ambition" cannot be hidden. Whether it is an ally of the United States or the "own son" of the United States, in this Sino-US chip dispute, they did not take advantage, but staged a farce of "self-damage by a thousand, wounding the enemy by eight hundred", and the "hegemonic" behavior of the old United States also slowed down the development of the entire industry, limited the cooperation and supply between enterprises and enterprises, in the end, they are all losers, why bother?
However, it should be noted that the disruption of Laomei has a positive effect on the development of the industry, that is, teaching chip companies to have a sense of crisis, can not continue to "comprador" or rely on Meixin, Huawei is a lesson in the past. Without their own chips, without their own technology, in the end they can only be led by the nose. TSMC and Samsung have also been taught a hard lesson, so "de-beautification" is imperative and urgent.
In addition to Chinese companies, other chip-related companies must also be arranged. Using beauty technology is tantamount to sending one's own lifeblood into the hands of others, without any sense of security or autonomy. Therefore, as Bill Gates said, since Laomei has issued a "goodwill" reminder to Chinese enterprises, do not live up to it, accelerate independent research and development, and strive to have self-developed powerful chips as soon as possible, which is the best counterattack to Laomei! What do you think about this? Welcome to comment and leave a message!