Booker said that the NBA's current scoring ability is stronger than mine, only 3 people, Durant, Lillard, Curry, as for James' scoring ability is very ordinary, can only be regarded as a third-rate, James's scoring method is mainly based on breakthrough and fast attack, this is because in the position of small forward, the whole league can hardly find someone who can compete with him physically, he became a historical total scoring also because of his long career, Harden was very strong at his peak, but he could not adapt to the rules, on the other hand, Curry, the three-point shooting history is unique, Lillard is also a big heart player, Durant's talent explodes, and his scoring ability is comparable to Jordan's, which can be said to be far above James.
No, no, no, on brushing points only serve you and Lillard, Curry can't play the data of five years ago, Durant's scoring ability is strong, look at the average score is only a few tenths more than James with poor scoring ability, the average point you can't play for a long time, the longer you play, the more you suffer, because the decline in the state behind will drag you down, James's basketball philosophy is to connect the team, if you only want to score, ten dare not say that five or six scoring champions are no problem. Curry is really not good, although he has won four championships, but he is surrounded by Thompson, Green, Igopel and other wolf-like brothers to support, weak defense, shooting is okay, not allowed like a headless fly.
Booker's view of James is a misunderstanding, you can make a comparison between James and Durant, first, James's advantage is that the breakthrough ability is the top in history, but it sets off the shooting ability is not strong, but the actual James' shooting ability is not bad, because you think James only has a breakthrough, so you think James' offensive skills are third-rate.
Second, Durant's face frame scoring ability is indeed very strong, but Durant's low back singles are almost non-existent, and the breakthrough ability is less and average. Because you only see that Durant's face frame is incomprehensible, you decide that Durant's scoring skills are top-notch. Obviously, James Durant has his own prominent side and a weaker side, but you only look at James' weaker side and not Durant's weaker side, so you have your own preconceptions.
Many people use the picturesque Jordan Kobe standard to measure James, making the lowest logical mistake! 1. The ultimate goal of basketball games is to score and win, not to have posture and no actual performance. 2. It's okay to choose a way that suits you better. Do you have to choose a way that you are less good at? 3, how is it not a basketball technique to break through the layup or break through the score?
You said that people didn't hit the shot, and in the 2012 playoffs, they beat the Green Army by making a shot; You say that people don't have 3 points, in 2013 the Spurs Heat grabbed seven to score 5 3 points, in 2020 G5 6 3 points; You said that people didn't shoot backwards, and they played the Raptors G2 in 18 years with 7 backs, the first in history. If it comes to discussing basketball technology, Old Jen's basketball technique is one of the most comprehensive ever. If it is a discussion of scoring methods, Lao Zhan will definitely not rank in the top 20 in history. In his own words, I was never a scorer. However, we can now see that his total score has reached the first place in history, which is the result of his physical talent and self-discipline.
Is James's self-discipline comparable to other players? What is it to play for a long time to become the total scoring king, who was born with a strong body, he has been training in the training room for many years in addition to the competition, and he has set up a personal training team with a lot of money, which has created his strong body and playing style!
In the early years, when Yao Ming first entered the league, he was also a technical stream, but after being trained as a giant by Van Gundy, he was also a standing center, mainly hooks and fixed-point jump shots, and O'Neill's figure can or needs to be picturesque? Why do problems that can be solved simply need to be complicated! It is a strange fallacy that in fighting, the means of simple attacks are far more useful than fancy moves.
What is scoring skills? Breakthroughs from various angles, mid-range shots, three-pointers, in general, these three. If you talk about details, such as whether it is a breakthrough layup or a breakthrough dunk, whether it is a mid-range emergency stop jumper or a backward shot, whether it is a strong three-point with the ball or a three-point catch without the ball, these are all too details, who is the top of these scoring skills?
What do you call scoring skills? Or are you referring to James' scoring methods that aren't beautiful enough, not flowing enough, not good enough? A person who has the third highest total score history is said by you to be a bad scoring skill. You can find someone you think is good at scoring, compare his scoring stats to James, and I'm sure you'll have a judgment.
James is quite skilled in dribbling on both left and right, which is considered the top of the forward player, more stable than many SGs, and certainly not comparable to point guards. The layup hand is very stable, the body control is excellent, it is the top, you can understand the movements of Bi Wei Shao, but the recent age, especially in the later stages of the game with serious physical exertion, lack of leg strength, resulting in a decrease in body control for the layup, easy to be taken or brushed out of the basket.
The restricted muscles are huge, the shooting action is a little stiffer, the shooting point is left off, and the body is slightly tilted, and the body control is not as good as the layup. Since the frame has a lot of offense and doesn't need to use too many footwork at all, this is not a great one, and objectively speaking, even if James has individual technical flaws, he is a historical player.