Under normal circumstances, the various mobile phone friends in China are still very harmonious.
Everyone was running on different tracks.
Although open and secret battles are indispensable, on the surface, they always encourage each other, improve each other, and are harmonious.
However, the recent machine circle has another big melon for us to eat.
As we all know, Huawei is an old technology company, established in 1987.
Seriously calculated, the nouveau riche in the machine circle can only be regarded as the second generation, and the domestic machines of the older generation still belong to China, China, Cool, and Linked.
Huahua (Huawei) has been through ups and downs for decades, and has also accumulated a lot of family wealth. If nothing else, the patent it holds in its hand is a big treasure for anyone, right.
Ah Hua was busy before, and he didn't seem to pay much attention to patents.
After shrinking the business during this period, it is time to start protecting its own patents.
Recently, #Huawei's lawsuit against Xiaomi for patent infringement has been accepted#, this topic has aroused heated discussions among netizens.
Recently, the State Intellectual Property Office accepted four Chinese patent infringement cases brought by Huawei against Xiaomi. The four patents involved in the dispute are:
1. "Method and apparatus for sending control signaling".
2. "Method for feeding back ACK/NACK information during carrier aggregation, base station and user equipment".
3. "A method and terminal for obtaining panoramic images".
4. "A lock screen method and mobile terminal".
Among them, cases No. 1 and No. 2 involve 4G/LTE technology, which belong to SEP.
Cases No. 3 and No. 4 involved mobile phone photography and unlocking technology, which are non-SEP patents.
Logically speaking, patent protection is a normal behavior, but when he saw the comment area, Jiang Sheng still frowned.
To be honest, who has worked hard for many years and applied for a patent, do not want to be directly used by others for nothing.
At present, the two parties involved are not as tense as we think.
On March 1, the two companies responded:
The two sides are actively negotiating a patent license. While continuing active negotiations, seek to use diversified mediation mechanisms to facilitate the conclusion of agreements.
It seems that people themselves are not very serious, and they are not as serious as netizens think, what huge compensation, what sky-high patent fees, there is still none.
To talk about the patent war, Apple and Samsung fought more fiercely.
In April 2011, Apple formally sued Samsung for patent infringement, and the appeal was even more extreme, directly wanting to ban the sale of Samsung worldwide.
The difference is that Apple protects its rights by appearance.
Look at the following two mobile phones, they do look eight points similar, although they are not a parent, but they do look like a bit of a relative.
Apple thinks:
Your copy is too obvious, directly covering the design appearance of the entire iPhone, Samsung should compensate the entire product, compensate for all the profits earned by this phone.
But Samsung feels that the appearance is just a small special part of the phone.
It is enough to compensate only according to the value of some parts, instead of directly bringing the pot to you.
To be honest, Samsung's wave is really a bit of a trick, and the value of an appearance case is very different from the value of the entire mobile phone.
The two sides have their own opinions and are incompatible with each other, which also made this lawsuit directly fought for 7 years.
In the past 7 years, the two sides have pulled each other and sued each other.
It was not until May 2018 that Apple and Samsung again went to court against Bo, and finally Samsung paid infringement fees to Apple5. With $3.9 billion, that's the end of the story.
Protecting one's own patents, in essence, is to protect originality, respect originality, and protect the rights of the original author of film and television dramas.
All patents need to be respected, regardless of circle.
Although we just eat melons when we see these news, the evaluation of "patent trolls" still has to be realistic.
Don't say anything else, wait for the follow-up.
The above material source network, such as infringement, contact to delete