Since the release of "Avatar" in 2009, Cameron has hardly been a director, but as a producer and screenwriter, because he put all his energy into the "Avatar" sequel.
The magic weapon for the top management to continue to invest money is to use the success story of making "Titanic" to bring huge wealth to the company, and how should Cameron make the audience accept the nearly three-hour movie time?
Previously, James Cameron revealed in an interview that "Avatar 2: The Way of Water" is about three hours long, and said that he had expected someone to complain that the film was too long, "I don't want to hear people who can watch 8 hours as soon as they sit down to watch the show, and still complain about the length of time." I know that the film critic will definitely write something like this: 'This three-hour movie is too painful', shut up! It's time for a major social paradigm shift. ”
Cameron's appearance can always bring about innovation in movies, and most of the second part of "Avatar" is underwater scenes, so there will definitely be a breakthrough in technology. In my opinion, if the story is good, the special effects are amazing, and the intention is profound, the three hours may feel a little short.
