Recently, Chinese scientists have discovered new evidence that man is a fish that is enough to support Darwin's theory of biological evolution.
The question arises, if fish are the ancestors of humans, who are the more recent ancestors?
Hematologists have thrown out Goldbach's new conjecture: frogs and toads or the more recent ancestors of humans.
This is because man did not evolve directly from a fish to an adult, but underwent what Darwin called an evolutionary process of "from aquatic to terrestrial, from simple to complex, from low to high". Frogs and toads are amphibians that are apparently the first link in the evolution of fish into adults.
Amphibians are a key part of the human race from fish to man
Therefore, no one should argue that the ancestors of human beings were amphibians. Frogs and toads are typical of amphibians and were widespread in ancient times. They gradually evolved into adults as they adapted to their living environment, which is quite likely. People who have seen frogs and toads will notice that their swimming posture is very similar to that of humans. And the body limbs, hands and feet are very similar to people, not to mention the skin.
Frogs and toads swim in a surprisingly consistent state with humans
If their belly is turned upside down, and then a person is also lying on the ground, the frog and the toad are the miniature version of the person.
Roasted frogs, like grilled fish, have become human food
The belly of a frog is usually white and smooth, and the skin feels the same as that of a human; The belly of the toad, although yellower and covered with pockmarks, is generally similar to human skin. In the crowds, we will find that there are many people, especially girls, with protruding pockmarks on their big arms. This is very similar to the body of a toad.
Therefore, a hypothesis can be boldly proposed: frogs evolved into smooth-skinned people, while toads evolved into people with pockmarks on the back of their arms.
Some people say that frogs and toads are so small, how can they evolve into tall people? Isn't the Archaeopteryx also not big? After hundreds of millions of years of evolution, it is completely possible to become tall. Giant frogs and toads are also seen in countries such as Ukraine.
In type B blood, the proportion of numbness in the arms and back is large
Looking further at life, we will also find that type B women have the largest proportion of arms and northern pockmarks. Most of these people originated in temperate grasslands, suitable for the environment where toads grow. Type A women have much smoother and more delicate skin, and Type A groups tend to be distributed in the south with more water sources.
So, another hypothesis is that the toad evolved into a type B nomadic people on the grasslands, and frogs evolved into a type A forest people in the south.
As we all know, the eyes of the toad are obviously smaller than those of the frog, which is more in line with the squinting eyes of the northern Mongol race.
Speaking of which, some people will ask why the Type 0 nation came from. Genetically, it is said that a fragment of type A blood has degenerated. So, most Type 0 skins are pretty good too.
The frogs all pose much like humans
In addition, frogs and toads have many similarities with humans, such as turning them into friends, and their jaws are strikingly similar to humans (of course, carp are also similar). If you are interested, you can continue to excavate.
When I was in middle school, I thought of this possibility, and today I also threw out the mystery of human evolution, and another Goldbach conjecture, that scientists can further emancipate their minds and innovate their thinking to prove whether my hypothesis or speculation is correct.