laitimes

Europe's energy lifeline is destroyed, like a backstabbing, who will be the biggest beneficiary?

author:The story of the journey of Brother Xin

#头条创作挑战赛 #

On September 26, local time, the "Nord Stream 1" and "Nord Stream 2" natural gas pipelines were seriously damaged on the Bernholm Island section in Denmark. After the incident, countries were in an uproar. Immediately after that, the President of the European Commission on the 27th von der Leyen posted on social media that any deliberate destruction of the energy infrastructure in use by EU countries is intolerable and will provoke the strongest reaction. This statement is even more meaningful.

What are the consequences of this incident? Who will be the biggest beneficiary? Interested friends, please like it, let's continue to read on.

The Russian Mission to the United Nations has requested a meeting of the United Nations Security Council for this reason, which will take place on Friday. Russia's attorney general's office said on Wednesday it was investigating the damage to the Nord Stream pipeline as an "act of international terrorism." The US State Department spokesman denied it, after all, the "pot" is too big. But coincidentally, Radoslaw Sikorski, a former Polish minister and member of the European Parliament, posted on social media Twitter on the 27th a photo of a massive gas leak in Baltic waters, with the caption "Thank you, America." What is more coincidental is that before the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Biden warned in an interview with the program: If Russia launches a war, "there will be no Nord Stream-2' gas pipeline, and we will end it... I promise you that we can do that. "And for the special proposal 'In what way?' When asked, his answer was: "I promise you that we can do this".

Europe's energy lifeline is destroyed, like a backstabbing, who will be the biggest beneficiary?

Image posted by Sikorsky

So many coincidences come down, it is clear that it is not a coincidence but a fact. Clear-eyed people know that it is that country, or the hard-line hawks against Russia represented by it, which is undoubtedly the biggest beneficiary. It is a very "American-style" approach, not acknowledging it on the lips, and doing whatever you want.

So, what are the consequences?

First, there must be an easing of Europe's energy shortages, hopelessness in the short term, and the continuation of the rise in world commodity prices. A drag on the recovery of the world economy.

Second, politically cut off the retreat of moderates in the West, and in a backstabbing-like manner, eliminate the possibility of easing relations with Russia, ending confrontation, and restoring energy supply. After all, anti-Russian "political correctness" is only the correctness of European politicians. However, the people of all countries, under the premise of enjoying many years of high welfare and high living standards, now have to bear the soaring cost of living and the pain caused by the lack of energy in all aspects. It is hard to imagine how long countries will continue to endure such suffering. If the pipeline is still intact, only one agreement is needed, that is, everyone is happy; And that's certainly what the United States, which is a big energy exporter and is currently mired in inflation, doesn't want to see. Now, the space for maneuvering has been narrowed, tying European countries to American chariots. It seems to have successfully stabilized the European teammates. But can it really achieve what you want? After all, Europe also has European interests, and now European politicians are generally silent. How it will develop in the future, we continue to observe.

There is also Russia's destruction of the European submarine gas pipeline, resulting in a reduction in its options. The Sino-Russian energy pipeline is far from emergency, while the land-to-European pipeline passes through Ukraine and Poland. In the current situation, the likelihood of reaching a conveyor agreement is extremely low. Economically, what will be the response of Russia, which has been cornered? Militarily, Russia responded with mobilization orders, so economically, whatever response it gave would undoubtedly put the situation in danger of escalating progressively.

This confrontation is already showing signs of getting out of control. But praying for peace is believed to be the aspiration of the people of every country. Like his friends, Brother Xin hopes that everyone can live a good and stable life. Friends who agree, please long press and click to support it.

By the way, it is reported that on the 26th, Putin signed a presidential decree deciding to grant Snowden Russian citizenship. This marks the year 2013, after Snowden, who discredited the United States, broke the "Prism Gate" incident; After 9 years of wandering, I finally have a stable life in Russia. Isn't this move setting a benign example for more people with lofty ideals who are dissatisfied with Western hegemony?!

Europe's energy lifeline is destroyed, like a backstabbing, who will be the biggest beneficiary?
Europe's energy lifeline is destroyed, like a backstabbing, who will be the biggest beneficiary?