laitimes

The assassination of Russidi, who had criticized Mo Yan as a "coward in the system", was the arrogance and prejudice of European and American values

author:Leisure Finance
The assassination of Russidi, who had criticized Mo Yan as a "coward in the system", was the arrogance and prejudice of European and American values

On August 12, when the British writer Salman Russidi was giving a speech in New York, the United States, a man suddenly rushed to the stage and stabbed more than 10 times, and the perpetrator was captured on the spot, and Russidi was immediately hospitalized.

On Aug. 14, Russidi's agent said that Russidi had removed his ventilator and was ready to speak. This may mean that the most dangerous time for Rusidi's life has passed.

Since the incident occurred in the United States, US President Biden, who attacked the incident, called it a "vicious attack".

An Indian-British writer was attacked in the United States, which seems to be very far away from us, and although there are many media reports in China, it obviously did not cause a bigger ripple. The views on the incident are also very different, and even some netizens use Roussidi's words to start telling something.

Idle Finance and Economics would like to say that for Rosidi himself, there are many places that we need to seriously hold, if you like the works of this British writer very much, but the values he advocates, our family does not dare to agree.

In 2012, Mo Yan won the Nobel Prize, and because he did not sign the joint signature, Russidi accused Mo Yan of being "a coward in the system like Sholokhov".

The assassination of Russidi, who had criticized Mo Yan as a "coward in the system", was the arrogance and prejudice of European and American values

A very interesting question is that Russidy scolded along with Sholokhov. Sholokhov is known to have won the Nobel Prize for his The Quiet Don.

Because the Chinese people are not very familiar with the character of Rosidi, his words and deeds and positions cannot be corrected for a while. However, we can argue sideways and refute Russidi's views through the views of well-known people.

Many years ago, the master writer Li Ao discussed the Western world in an interview, gave a sensational conclusion about the position of the Nobel Prize in Literature, "You have to betray your country, it is possible to win the prize", and further pointed out, "Except for the book "Quiet Don River" written by soviet writers who praise the Soviet Union, everything else is to oppose their own motherland, and now it is popular to sell your motherland, and these foreigners are happy." ”

If Your Excellency believes that Li Ao's views alone may not be convincing, Lu Xun's weight may be difficult to refute. As early as the 1920s, before "Quiet Don" won the Nobel Prize (awarded in 1965), related works received Lu Xun's attention. In the 1930s, Jin Ren, who was deeply influenced by Lu Xun, successively published a series of translations including "Quiet Don River" in the "Translation" edited by Lu Xun.

That is to say, the great work of "Quiet Don River" has the firm support of people like Lu Xun and Li Ao behind it, while Sholokhov and Mo Yan have been mercilessly ridiculed by Lu Xidi himself!

What went wrong?

The assassination of Russidi, who had criticized Mo Yan as a "coward in the system", was the arrogance and prejudice of European and American values

Simply we thought that science has no borders, and when we experienced the neck of American technology card, we knew that for many years we were misled by Western ideas; When Li Ao pointed out that Western literature has a value bias and Russidi smeared important authors, we know that the Western literary world is also full of extreme arrogance and prejudice.

While Rosidi slammed Mo Yan and Sholokhov, the Indian writer Misra made Russidi reflect on himself, "British and American writers do not have the courage to oppose the war waged by the United States."

Leisure Finance and Economics believes that Russidi, a writer who is highly respected in the Western world, is very much in line with Li Ao's view of "selling out his country" and winning Western literary awards.

Obviously, this Indian-born Rusidi betrayed not Britain, but India, and even the entire Islamic world.

Let's look at several of Russidi's masterpieces, which are undoubtedly the position of Mr. Li Ao: "Midnight Child", which infuriated the "mother country" India and listed it as a banned book, but Russidi won the highest award in the British literary world------ Booker Award; Shame, banned by Pakistan; The Satanic Psalms met with resistance from almost the entire Islamic faith nation, and Iran's spiritual leaders issued hunting orders for it.

Such a person not only won the highest glory in the British literary world, but also was knighted by the Queen of England.

How to evaluate Lusiddi, I think the Chinese people already have their own judgment, Li Ao's unique perspective, can be described as whiplash into it. Russidi, who was born in Mumbai, India, was regarded by his father as the "contrarian son" of Islam, and in the end this "contrarian son" won the high "recognition" of the Western world by betraying the spiritual culture of his home country!