This is the first year of brave know-it-all writing
The 44th original article
The previous article focused on the leaf farmers because O'Brien's planning was 'famous', because it involved zhengzhi issues, so it was quickly widely concerned in China, commented on, and insulted. Traitors, traitors, scum, cartilages, and so on. As a leaf farmer who understands, calmly accept this 'fruit'.
In this article, we focus on talking about the leaf farmer taking the initiative to return to China to accept the summons, in the police review, fully demonstrated the Marxist truth-seeking, but also a polemic that understands people against the confused people, the result is beyond doubt, the leaf farmer gained freedom, but also met a new friend, a high position of authority, by the leaf farmer's wisdom, wisdom, thoughts, and took the initiative to become friends with the leaf farmer.
The hero in the book has such charm, who chats with him, in the end has a harvest. For example, Sister Meng, after interacting with Ye Zinong several times, directly wants to be someone's girlfriend; Brother Jiu, after chatting with Ye Zinong several times about the business of the noodle shop, became enlightened and used the Marxist ideological guidance to do the noodle shop business, and the future can be expected; Brandi, since seeing the earning power of leaf farmers, has a very deep speculative thought, chasing and running to cooperate with leaf farmers, with hundreds of millions of contracts to leaf farmers to sign; George, the president of a Fortune 500 company, met Leaf Farmer, less than 5 minutes, and was made 56 million by the other party, which was Yaxinggao.
This article focuses on Ye Zinong's use of Marxist truth-seeking for his own innocence. Exciting. The defense was wonderful, and I finally made a friend.
p: Are you suspected of organizing illegal border crossings?
Marxist: Suspected, do you have doubts? Ask what you want?
p: When he went to the countryside that year, he used the dual-track price system and the internal settlement system of the oil field to use internal checks to purchase the country's scarce materials, and resold them on the black market at a price several times higher than the allocated price, taking away more than 1 million US dollars a year.
Marxists: How can township enterprises find rice to cook, how can it be called the black market? How does the black market define dual-track? We repaired cars for the oil field, they had no money, they could only take the internal check to raise the physical object for money, the physical object was the transfer price, the sale to the township enterprise was the market price, the pain of the transition from the dual-track system to the market economy, I could only adapt.
P: Start playing the emotional card, you think you are the son of the general, your parents are loyal party members, I hope you inherit the legacy and be a person who intends the people.
Marxists: Truth depends on blood, and maybe one day it will be completely unrecognizable....
Speaking of the end, directly to the other side of the whole speechless.....
Senior: You are the political minister of the 'enemy', and the negative impact is self-evident.
Marxist: I now declare: You are God. Can you show me all one?
Senior: You didn't read the question, how do you conclude that George is wrong?
Marxist: Do you still need to judge whether you want to deny that China is based on Marxism?
The following topic about 'side to see two', I have read it many times, but I still haven't understood it. The original text is copied as follows, and everyone understands it.
Ye Zinong said: Any deduction of the principle setting of the contract that I should sign must be leaked. In other words, any principle setting that can deduce a wrong conclusion cannot be conclusive. No matter what his specific settings are, there must be leaks, but the difference between such a leak and a leak. The relative and absolute proposition that George sets up is that there are two sides, and he himself knows that it is wrong, and this mistake is a logical trap, the proposition that leads me to admit change and invariance, but George does not know that although the proposition of change and invariance has gone to two to one, it is only out of the realm of side seeing and having two, and going to two is still one. It does not prevent one from still leaking, not empty. If George had left to go, he would not have asked me to go to New York.
This article is written here first, and readers who read it with their hearts should sink their hearts and chew on the words of the leaf farmers. He said a lot of theories, and he could guide his own work practice.
There are two when I see it, two to one, I leave, I don't have one to go to two, I fainted, I really can't understand it. Continue thinking about it tomorrow.