laitimes

If "radiation fish" are caught in Fukushima, Japan, radioactive materials are seriously exceeded, is it feasible to discharge nuclear nuclei into the sea?

author:Singularity messenger

A few days ago, a Japanese research institute in the fukushima coastal waters, caught a kind of marine fish called "Hsu flat carp", through the test, the body of this marine fish radioactive material seriously exceeded the standard, and as early as February this year, Japan for the health of the public, has suspended the sale of "Hsu flat carp".

If "radiation fish" are caught in Fukushima, Japan, radioactive materials are seriously exceeded, is it feasible to discharge nuclear nuclei into the sea?

When this news was reported, it also worried fishermen along the mainland, because this "radiation fish" does not only inhabit The Sea of Japan, but also has a very large number of people along the southeast coast of the mainland, and is one of the most important economic fish on the mainland.

Since the "Koh's Flat Scorpion" has no national boundaries and can go to any habitat at will in the sea, mainland fisheries experts are worried that perhaps the "Koh's Flat Fish" in the mainland waters has also been polluted by Japanese radiation fish, which directly affects the development of marine fisheries on the mainland and endangers people's health.

If "radiation fish" are caught in Fukushima, Japan, radioactive materials are seriously exceeded, is it feasible to discharge nuclear nuclei into the sea?

In addition, on the morning of July 22, local time in Japan, Japan officially decided to discharge nuclear contaminated water into the sea starting next spring, which also made many people in Japan take to the streets to protest against it.

Since the fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan leaked, in the past 11 years, there have been "radiation fish" in Japanese waters that have been fished ashore, which shows that there is already nuclear pollution in Japanese waters, so if Japan really "discharges nuclears into the sea" next year, then there is a high probability that the global sea areas will be polluted.

If "radiation fish" are caught in Fukushima, Japan, radioactive materials are seriously exceeded, is it feasible to discharge nuclear nuclei into the sea?

How harmful is Japan's nuclear wastewater from entering the sea?

For example, if Japan starts discharging nuclear wastewater into the Pacific Ocean in early March next year, most of the Pacific ocean will be polluted by the end of April or early May next year.

Although the Japanese side claims that the nuclear wastewater discharged into the sea will be diluted, some scientists have pointed out that the existing science and technology cannot dilute the nuclear wastewater to a safe range, even after treatment, it will still contain a variety of radioactive elements, so that their harm to the earth will be calculated in "thousands of years".

Therefore, in fact, not only other countries, but also many Japanese people, are also opposed to Japan's discharge of nuclear wastewater, but Japan is bent on going its own way and simply ignoring everyone's condemnation and opposition.

If "radiation fish" are caught in Fukushima, Japan, radioactive materials are seriously exceeded, is it feasible to discharge nuclear nuclei into the sea?

So why is there a global objection to Japan still discharging nuclear wastewater? Is there really no one to take care of it?

Affected by the movement of ocean currents, once Japan's nuclear wastewater enters the sea, coastal countries will be affected, including the United States on the other side of the ocean, which is also one of the most important affected countries.

However, since Japan proposed to discharge nuclear wastewater into the sea, the United States has not expressed its position, and even expressed its support for Japan's decision, which has also made many people wonder, is the United States not afraid of radiation?

If "radiation fish" are caught in Fukushima, Japan, radioactive materials are seriously exceeded, is it feasible to discharge nuclear nuclei into the sea?

The answer, of course, is not so, in fact, the United States does not object, because for many years, the United States has been quietly discharging nuclear wastewater, nuclear waste into the ocean, for example, last year, the United States was exposed to scandals, in the southern California seabed, found more than 27,000 barrels of highly toxic pesticide waste.

At the same time, the US military's Hanford military base has quietly discharged 3,000 tons of nuclear wastewater into the sea in 8 years, and obviously, compared with Japan, the situation of the United States discharging nuclear weapons into the ocean is absolutely more than that.

If "radiation fish" are caught in Fukushima, Japan, radioactive materials are seriously exceeded, is it feasible to discharge nuclear nuclei into the sea?

Naturally, if the United States opposes Japan's discharge of nuclear sewage, then these ugly deeds of its own years will be exposed one by one and thus condemned by the world, but if it is in favor of Japan's discharge of nuclear sewage, then the United States can continue to pollute the marine environment and ecological environment.

Therefore, because the United States does not oppose, Japan will feel that it has a "backbone" and still insists on discharging nuclear wastewater, and doing so is indeed the most cost-saving and trouble-saving way, but it is also an extremely selfish act, because once the earth's biological genes are destroyed and human genes are polluted, then what will eventually be destroyed will be the future of all mankind.

If "radiation fish" are caught in Fukushima, Japan, radioactive materials are seriously exceeded, is it feasible to discharge nuclear nuclei into the sea?

So, what are the hazards of Nuclear Wastewater in Japan to humans?

First of all, the most direct point is that in the future, human beings may no longer be able to obtain food resources from the ocean, because when marine organisms are contaminated with radioactive materials and have become "radiation organisms", then they can no longer be used by humans, so that the "hunger crisis" of human beings may be more serious.

Secondly, as early as 2019, some researchers pointed out that when nuclear wastewater enters the sea, it is very likely to cause human cancer and become common, especially thyroid cancer, leukemia, etc., which will cause harm to humans.

If "radiation fish" are caught in Fukushima, Japan, radioactive materials are seriously exceeded, is it feasible to discharge nuclear nuclei into the sea?

In addition, Fukushima nuclear wastewater also contains some radioactive materials that will have human DNA, even after dilution, there is still a great risk, so Japan is extremely irresponsible to do so, and Japan simply can not bear the consequences caused by it, without full consultation with other countries, Japan privately decided to discharge nuclear wastewater into the sea, which will inevitably lead to a big mistake.

If "radiation fish" are caught in Fukushima, Japan, radioactive materials are seriously exceeded, is it feasible to discharge nuclear nuclei into the sea?

So, friends, in your opinion, is it possible to prevent The discharge of Japanese nuclear wastewater into the sea before next spring and let Japan cancel this "anti-human" decision? Welcome to leave a message and tell us your opinion!

Read on