Originally, the Tesla brand was very topical and controversial, and this time it happened to catch up with the star Lin Zhiying who drove Tesla into a car accident, which is simply the superposition of double Buff. The heat of the whole incident is like the roaring flames burned by the Tesla after the collision, directly "Xi ti hot search".
However, the good news is that according to the current situation, although it suffered a fairly violent impact and caused the vehicle to catch fire, Lin Zhiying's father and son were in good health and did not suffer serious damage, which is a fortunate misfortune. This also shows that the passive safety of tesla model X is beyond doubt. Because the cause of the fire is currently under investigation, we will not discuss why the car caught fire for the time being. According to the surveillance video of the relevant road section, the cause of the accident is likely to be caused by Lin Zhiying's distraction in driving. So the question is, why did Tesla, which has many driver assistance systems in one, not predict the impending accident? In other words, are these "automatic driving assistance systems" that are "blown into the sky" by various manufacturers really reliable?
In fact, I don't know if you have found that the "L2 level intelligent driving assistance system" advertised by manufacturers is actually not the "automatic driving system" that many of us understand, and the word "assist" is the core. It should be known that the current globally recognized autonomous driving assistance system is divided into 5 levels, from L1 level to L5 level. Strictly speaking, only by reaching L5 can it be truly said to be an "autonomous driving" system, and everything else can only be called an "automatic driving assist" system.
So one would ask, are we still far from true L5 autonomous driving? The answer is very distant, most likely decades of cumulative technology. In fact, even Tesla's "head" Musk himself once said: "Achieving real automatic driving is much more difficult than imagined." Because "the entire traffic road system is actually designed for the human eye and the human brain, in order to truly develop a car that can replace the human driver, AI must restore the visual imaging of the human eye, and the processing function of the neural network for vision." In addition to the constraints of technical factors, the current legal provisions do not support the real "automatic driving", the simplest is that if a traffic accident occurs after using the automatic driving function, who is responsible? Is it a driver, a car manufacturer, a software developer, or a cat and a dog on the side of the road? This question seems difficult to answer.
Back to the matter itself, why did this Tesla Model X with L2-level driver assistance system and even Tesla's self-developed "full autopilot capability" function have such a tragic accident. In the final analysis, with the current existing technology and capabilities, it is not possible to replace people, because these "perception systems" on the car will be interfered with by various external factors, resulting in false alarms and even "strikes". So I'm going to make a big guess here that it's likely that the cameras and radars on the car that sense the external environment are affected by some unknowable influences, malfunctions, or misjudgments. As a result, the driver failed to respond after the driver was distracted, and eventually an accident occurred.
Therefore, although the current "automatic driving assistance system" has a very powerful function, it is still only as an "auxiliary", and it is the driver himself who really grasps the driving safety. Only by enhancing road safety awareness can we fundamentally reduce the probability of traffic accidents. Always remember: there are thousands of roads, safety is the first, driving is not standardized, and relatives have two lines of tears.