Yesterday afternoon, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced that the "asterisk" mark of the communication itinerary card will be cancelled to support the efficient coordination of yi. situation prevention and control and social and economic development, and to facilitate the travel of the majority of users.
In the afternoon of the same day, the search popularity of hotels and air tickets on major travel platforms rose sharply, and this rally was really a bit amazing:
Although the search does not necessarily mean that there is energy and financial resources to travel, it at least indicates an attitude and an intention. This intention is still relatively strong.
However, is it really possible to go out and surf at will?
The previous itinerary code with stars is that as long as your city (prefectural level) has no symptoms/diagnosis within 14 days, or medium and high-risk areas, when you go to other places, the itinerary code will automatically carry a star. Moreover, medium- and high-risk areas are divided regionally according to streets or one or several districts, but the itinerary code is divided according to prefecture-level cities.
It is said that as long as the diagnosis is found in time, the transmission is blocked and the transmission is strong, and the division of medium and high risk is reasonable, in fact, it should not affect the travel, after all, the local is like this, the medium and high risk areas are isolated, and the rest of the place is as usual, which does not affect daily life at all.
However, the itinerary code is with stars, even if the locally confirmed area is far from the district and county where they are located, the itinerary of the confirmed case has nothing to do with themselves, but they have served in other provinces and cities, ranging from three days to two tests, seven days of home health testing, seven days of home isolation or seven days of home isolation plus seven days of health testing, and the heaviest direct 14 days of centralized isolation.
Over the past two years or so, except for an unspeakable large-scale spillover in a certain province, the spillover in other places has not been serious.
Prevention and control in various places is good, in fact, it is enough to seriously carry out three days of two inspections in the outside world, and it is enough to carry out a seven-day home health test, but why are all over the place increasing the number layer by layer? In addition to a certain degree of reasonableness for a place that has lost credibility, what is reasonable for other places?
This is good, originally the itinerary code with stars only reminded the area where this person is located has certain risks, but all places are directly taking formal "strict control" measures without asking.
Say it is a "form", for example, the author friend's family of four came back from the field a few days ago, originally according to local requirements, out of the high-speed rail station should scan the code, and then will pop up the window, and then three days two inspections can be restored. The author came back from his hometown during May Day is like this, the check is still quite strict, but recently it seems that the limelight has passed, the author's friend and husband and wife scanned the code, and then successfully left the station, after that, the scan code was not done in time to do the nucleic acid yellow code, and the other person has been a green code. Later, of course, both went to do nucleic acid...
As for the nucleic acid detection side, many netizens on the Internet are spitting on the dragonfly shallow drifting in the water, and they don't know if it is useful. Anyway, the nucleic acid testing company got the money, the tested person got the green code, and the disease control got the data, which was really happy.
This is the pass is very strict in form, but it actually leaks into a sieve. Then the internal "normalization" even requires 24-48 hours of nucleic acid (because there is no money, many places have been cancelled one after another), and when something happens, it will be a big one-size-fits-all, and even normal medical treatment, farming, and grocery shopping have been blocked...
That is to say, the itinerary code with no stars, in fact, does not affect the impulse to expand everywhere, after all, relatively accurate + a certain amount of redundancy, guarding the key threshold requires a lot of meticulous and hard work, and the full set of routines in the form of a place, or even too much is simple, at least in case there is a real problem, all parties have an explanation - I have done the whole action, can not hold me accountable!
Naturally, although the itinerary code with stars was cancelled by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, various localities did not actually operate in accordance with the ninth version of the prevention and control plan that has changed. For example, a red code famous city, still come up to give the red code, even if people return, still have not lifted the red code.
The following figure is the risk area delineation and removal standards and prevention and control measures compiled by netizen Xiao SerRy according to the ninth edition of the prevention and control plan. This version of the prevention and control plan can be said to summarize the previous lessons learned across the country and unify the standards, and the strict places will be stricter, and the places that can be loosened will be looser.
According to this requirement, as long as there is a confirmed diagnosis or asymptomatic is a high-risk area, which also solves the problem of a certain unspeakable province dividing itself into medium and high risk, infecting more than 600,000 people but not a high-risk area, breaking the mutual trust across the country; Combined with the itinerary code to look at the stars, the future prevention and control may be more "accurate", which is also hoped to maintain the normal economy and life at a smaller cost.
However, some places have developed alternative star schemes.
For example, Hangzhou next to a certain province directly made a red "for the local health code"! " to prompt.
Xijing directly set up four colors of gray, green, blue and yellow, which were thinner than the previous stars.
That is to say, in some places, the star of the itinerary code is gone, but everything has not changed. Where there are confirmed cases in prefecture-level cities in foreign provinces and cities, the whole territory is still managed in accordance with medium- and high-risk areas.
That is to say, the prevention and control measures in some places, at least for the time being, are to change the soup without changing the medicine, how to dry it before, how to dry it now, there will still be no loosening, and it will not be really effective.
So, do you really dare to go past the wave without knowing anything about the destination prevention and control measures – the itinerary code does not have a star anyway? Aren't you afraid that the code will change color inexplicably or be pulled to isolation?