Hey, here's the spicy strips
Recently, the textbook incident, spicy strips sent a lot of articles in this regard.
Unfortunately, all of them were restricted.
It's hard.
Lao Hu's name has more or less been heard of in the media.
There are many supporters of him on the Internet, and there are also many who look down on him.
People who support him, spicy strips look at the words of these netizens, the first feeling in their brains is.
Isn't this the state of fans chasing love beans?
Very brainless kind, everything about Love Beans is good, and he has no ability to judge himself at all.
Those who oppose him, some netizens are very fierce in their words.
There is also a part of the feeling that the old beard is in and the mud, the wall head grass, hides itself too deeply.
Today we compare Lao Hu's words before and after the textbook illustration incident, what kind of person he really is, and we will know it at a glance.
First vocalization
When the matter first came out, Lao Hu also exported his views at the first time.
At length, it can be summarized into the following points.
First: I came up and made myself indignant about the matter of illustration, which broke through the category of "style", and we must strictly investigate this matter.
This is even if Lao Hu showed his attitude, but also laid the tone of speech, won a lot of praise.
But the second half of the sentence is not right, he said that this is not acceptable in terms of moral and cultural correctness.
Illustration is this a moral issue? Is it a matter of culture?
Second: It is difficult to understand why the author is so engaged? I hope that the author will stand up and give the public an explanation.
Third: rectification, the public should not be excited, patiently wait for the results. Don't panic, our backyard hasn't been raided.
Fourth: Don't jump to conclusions, look at the final findings, which he believes have been corrupt.
Fifth: This matter is probably a loophole in the editorial review of the Renjiao Society, and many books are published a year, and it is inevitable that they will miss it.
Sixth: This incident has sounded a wake-up call for us not to be sloppy, and it has clearly pointed out that this incident has seriously misled children's values.
From these words, it can be seen that Lao Hu has shaped himself into a neutral image.
Impartial evaluation, I have to say that Lao Hu is very smart.
But cleverness is mistaken by cleverness, this is not a screenwriter to see the omission, nor is it a moral issue, a cultural issue.
Rather, it is a real violation of the National Flag Law.
The whole article seems to be still the same set of old Hu, saying that half of the routine is left half.
On the one hand, I want to show my attitude, and on the other hand, I advise everyone not to pay too much attention to the illustration thing, which is a small matter.
Lao Hu's fans also agree with him, and he has invisibly influenced the thinking of many people.
In the end, as Lao Hu wished, the heat of this matter decreased, and now it is gone.
Second vocalization
A few days later, the incident became more and more noisy, and within a week, Lao Hu stood up again and spoke out.
The timing of his vocalizations was well chosen.
It said that he would immediately jump out to support him if he was strictly investigated.
This statement can be summarized as follows.
First: this matter will come to light, and everyone should believe the results of the investigation.
Second: I am very supportive of a comprehensive review of primary and secondary school textbooks.
Third: We must seek truth from facts and must prevent the occurrence of excessive rectification.
Lao Hu used a double affirmation here, which shows that he attaches great importance to the boundaries of the scope of rectification.
Fourth: We have once again stressed that our publishing industry position has not been lost. If you say that you have lost it, it is harmful, that is, there is an ulterior motive.
Once again, we should emphasize that the position has not been lost, what is the intention? The country's largest publishing houses are already like this, so what about other small publishing houses? And take this as a small thing.
The ancestors said a thousand years ago that they were born in sorrow and died in comfort.
We have stood for thousands of years, and every time we fall into a trough, we can quickly stand up, and a sense of distress is crucial.
Fifth: The problem of teaching materials for the Human Education Society appears in their management, and the position of other publishing houses is still good.
This is obviously a blind rip-off, and the internet broke the news that Lao Hu must have not looked at it and expressed his position.
In addition to the Renjiao edition, there are also Guangjiao editions, Shaanxi Editions, Dictionaries, Cihai and many other teaching and auxiliary materials.
In a previous survey, there were 62 kinds of books that went wrong, with a rate of more than five in 10,000.
According to the book regulations, if the error rate exceeds one in 10,000, the book is considered unqualified.
Among them, more than 5/10,000 of books are recycled and destroyed, and less than 5/10,000 of them are recycled and rectified.
However, these books have been circulating in the market for more than 10 years.
So it's not just a matter of a single-person church.
Sixth: This is a local problem of teaching materials, which cannot be related to other publishing fields, and we must protect the prosperity of the publishing industry today.
After reading these words, how do you feel?
Is it the kind of thing, listen to the king's words, or a seat.
In fact, Lao Hu still invisibly emphasized the focus of his concern.
Teaching materials can not be expanded, the scope of the solution is the best.
Deal with those responsible, but do not blindly criticize others and do not implicate other areas.
Anyway, that means to persuade netizens to want, and it is appropriate to stop.
In fact, the first time he spoke, the meaning between his words was also to hope that everyone would not expand too much and stop at the right time.
He seemed to be afraid that this matter would make a big fuss and make the entire publishing industry be investigated.
In fact, what the majority of netizens are most afraid of is that the investigation is not thorough, the big things are small and the small things are small, and finally take a form.
After all, Wu Yong's heat has gone down so quickly, which has made the majority of netizens chill.
The heat is not as hot and long-lasting as the melon in the circle.
It is precisely Lao Hu who advocates not expanding the incident.
Then Lao Hu naturally can't get any good fruit.
Comparing the two posts, it can actually be clearly seen that the structure of the old Hu post is first approved and then turned.
I agree with various propositions and decisions, and then I express my intentions.
Lao Hu is actually very clever, he has always maintained a reasonable attitude, and neither side wants to offend.
His so-called rationality, neutrality, and objectivity are the grass on the wall in the eyes of the public.
After all, he also had a lot of punches in the face, when Zheng Flood was in trouble, he said he believed in the results, and as a result, he concealed more than a hundred people.
Old Hu turned 180 degrees in speech at this time, and the feelings of good people let him be.
In addition, these texts he sent, according to the platform display have been edited twice, what the original version is like is unknown.
Since the second revision was made, this shows that he felt that there was something wrong with the original language.
The last lenovo incident, Lao Hu's strange statement, has made him suffer a lot, and it is said that he lost eight million powders overnight.
Today's public's remarks about Lao Hu are that it feels very reasonable to listen to and look at, but when you think about it carefully, you feel that it is very tasteless.
Can't stand up to scrutiny, always have something to say. Is this the legendary half of the talk left.
Just like Lao Hu commented on the Bentley and Rolls-Royce parking space dry rack incident two days ago.
He hoped: "All public officials and cadres' families must be low-key, calm when they have disputes with people outside, and cannot show their 'strength' arbitrarily, otherwise they will be chicken feathers and pay a price." The same is true of the rich, do not show richness, but oppress people with wealth."
Isn't this just teaching them to make a fortune in a muffled voice? Outsiders love to say what they want, and the deep point you hide and the better point of disguise will be safe.
In fact, the common people have never hated the rich, they hate to get rich for the rich and the unkind.
For example, Lao Cao, many netizens want him to become the world's richest man and make the glass business an alien.
I think of an incident in which a mother taught her son who violated traffic rules and said, "What a man who wears leather shoes and he wears straw shoes."
Doesn't this sound very unpleasant?
I also remembered Mr. Lu Xun's words: May the Chinese youth get rid of the cold air and just go upwards. Don't listen to the self-defeating. Do things that can be done, make a sound that can be heard. There is a light, a heat. Just like fireworks, you can also emit a little light in the dark. You don't have to wait for the torch.
【Spicy strips original handling report】