Since mid-April, many media in Europe, the United States and Russia have reported that there is a "big fish" in the Azov Steel Mill in Mariupol that can amaze the world. One said that the retired Lieutenant General of Canada, because of evading domestic legal sanctions, hid in Ukraine to earn this outlaw money. It seems that it can't be mixed up in Canada. Second, biden's younger son is also in the underground fortress of the Azov steel mills. If it was him, old Biden was not miserable enough, the obedient eldest son had just died, and the younger son was going to die again. This old man really can't afford to hurt, after all, at such an old age, he not only has to manage a huge state apparatus, but also has to work hard for the life and death of his inattentive son. It was hard for him.
Hent is with his father Biden
It has been almost a month since the big fish was caught, and it was this fish that had the ability to take small steps like loach, and it was so slippery that it could not keep its hands, or there was no so-called "big fish" at all. Is there any, and it doesn't matter? To be honest, even if you catch it, the top ball is just a prop to play lip service. Everyone should think about why the Ukrainian army spent such a big price to stick to the Azov steel mill. Why is the United States pressing Ukraine to hold on to the last line of defense in Mariupol? These two questions can open a brain hole, we may wish to think about whether there are invisible things in the underground fortress of the Azov Steel Mills, and the exposure of these things will make the United States feel afraid. Synthesizing multiple sources, my first feeling is that there is an American biochemical laboratory in the underground fortress. People say, right?
First, if the United States is caught in the biochemical laboratory under the Azov Steel Mill, is it useful?
What I'm talking about here is "useful?" "Can the international community help the United States?" Whether it is useful or not, not to mention. Now what we want to know is "yes or no". It is an indisputable fact that the U.S. military has established biochemical laboratories around the world and conducted crazy biochemical experiments, and even the United States itself has not bothered to argue with it. Because the sensational evidence is always there. In the United Nations General Assembly, the Russian representative has submitted verification applications many times, the voice is broken, the hand that prepares the materials is grinding cocoons, and the United Nations General Assembly is inadmissible, because the United Nations is not the United Nations, it is interesting. If Russia has the final say, then what materials need to be submitted, direct verification is. To put it bluntly, the United Nations and the United States have the final say. Since it is useless, I am too lazy to say, which is also not right. It's one thing to say yes, it's another thing to say whether it's useful or not, so Russia still has to keep saying it.
Oh, just when Russia was accusing the United States at the United Nations General Assembly, the United States was atmospheric, and the backhand sentence "Russia is trying to attack Ukraine with biological and chemical weapons" flipped the theme of the discussion of the United Nations General Assembly to "Russia has not used biological and chemical weapons in Ukraine." It seems that in the United Nations, it is still necessary to have a group of little brothers to help. Russia is less of a little brother, so there is such an embarrassment.
Let's sort out the latest evidence about the biochemical laboratory in the United States, each of which is a bloody tragedy. The first is to experiment with mentally ill people. Is this what people do? But the Americans did it, can you say they're not human? People also flaunt their own civilized people. The international community really can't take the United States, and the major mainstream media, governments, and pharmaceutical companies in Europe and the United States have all remained silent about it. This silence is a red flag, a complete loss of humanity.
This really spares the mass media, how to justify itself for the United States, there is a vulgar saying, licking the american ass, really TMD is difficult to do.
Here are a few key pieces of evidence that need to be crossed out:
First, the special military operation launched by Russia has ruined the good things of the United States, interrupted the Biochemical Experimental Project of the United States in Ukraine, and undermined its good deeds of experimenting with Ukrainians.
I have always wondered why a third-rate country can coerce European and American countries to aid Ukraine without limits, maliciously slander Germany, reject the German president, and slander the German prime minister as a "sausage." Is it that Ukraine has goods in its hands and has taken the European and American countries. If so, it's easy to understand.
Second, Ukraine is a test product of a new product developed by the United States in biological and chemical weapons.
In the name of developing new drugs, there is a pitiful amount of money to recruit poor Ukrainians to participate in experiments, mice are voluntary, I did not force them in the United States, and chose to clean myself. Abominable, annoying.
Third, a psychiatric hospital in Kharkov, Ukraine, is a base for the U.S. Department of Defense to conduct biochemical experiments on Ukrainian civilians.
In addition, in the Ludinsk region, in 2020, someone deliberately spread the currency contaminated with drug-resistant tuberculosis bacteria. I had to say "Oh yes" again. America, Europe and Ukraine, what do you really want to do?
Fourth, US President Joe Biden is an advocate of biochemical activities in Ukraine.
The world knows that Biden's youngest son Hunter is the actual implementer of the biochemical experimenter, and Putin's special military operations have cut off his financial path, which can explain that Biden's repeated statements to Russia are very fanatical. Biden: It turns out that Putin is too ignorant and cut off my financial road, so don't blame me for being rude to you.
I've collected too many entries to list them all here.
It can be said that the ironclad evidence is like a cow's hair, does it work? Or it doesn't work.
The United States said: No matter how much ironclad evidence there is, it can't help me, I don't admit it, I didn't participate, it was all done by Ukrainians, and what to do with me.
This kind of rogue face is not the "expression muscle" that the United States has been using for many years.
If you dig deeper, there is no meaning, only that it is not over.
Second, is there really a "big fish" underground in the Azov steel mill in Mariupol?
From the tragic and then think about it, it should be a loss of conscience, so what about further down? It's like finding a better adjective. At that time, in Asia, the United States absorbed the notorious 731 unit of Japanese militarism, and the international community did not even dare to put a fart, and in Europe, many German experts were also absorbed by the United States, and the international community did not cough. For more than seventy years, the United States has become accustomed to doing whatever it wants, and no one dares to point fingers in front of the United States. Hence the blatant refusal to sign the Biological Weapons Convention. 183 countries around the world have signed, and only the United States has refused to sign, why? The skinless and faceless United States is not going to engage in some big conspiracy, and the object of this big conspiracy is estimated to be a role that the United States cannot overthrow according to conventional methods. This deserves the close attention of the international community.
Back to the theme of "big fish" in Mariupol, there are big fish under the ground of the Azov steel mill, and this big fish, if I guess correctly, should be related to anti-humanity, otherwise, why did the United States give Ukraine the order to die and stick to the Azov steel mill?
The various types of information on the comprehensive network can be roughly described as follows:
The first: a Canadian retired lieutenant general who was caught while fleeing in disguise, according to various media. Since the fish was caught, why were the Russians still catching it? The best explanation is that this fish is not the other.
Retired Lieutenant General of Canada
Second: As I mentioned earlier, Biden's youngest son, Hunter, is a big fish. If not, why didn't Hunter show up to refute the rumors. It is also strange that this kind of dog blood is not entertainment news. Of course, there is also evidence that Hunter may be a big fish. Didn't Biden's wife suddenly visit Kiev the day before yesterday for this?
The third: The underground fortress has a large number of scientists in biochemical laboratories. And these scientists are of great value, if they are captured by the Russian army, these experts are Russian, and the results of the United States spending so much effort and money to develop will be surrendered to Russia. This time, it is also the turn of the United States to plunder talents, and Russia really wins back a game for the international community. The arrest of this group of personnel can only prove the existence of biochemical laboratories, in fact, this fact has long been ironclad, except for scientists, there is no value.
Fourth: Both the United States and NATO have said they will not send troops to Ukraine to fight, because this is Russia's bottom line, and if it enters the war, Russia will have a reason to use tactical nuclear weapons. If there are U.S. and NATO instructors in the underground fortress, the United States and NATO are not at a loss. I think that in fact, this does not have much effect, the United States and NATO do not recognize the account, the wording can be imagined, "They are retired soldiers, to Ukraine to participate in the war is purely a personal act, does not represent the government." "
To sum up, whether there is a "big fish" that has little impact on the war situation between Russia and Ukraine, even if the above four facts are true, will the ALLies of the United States collectively turn against the United States? It's also naïve, let's not take it too seriously and just laugh.
Third, in fact, the real "big fish" is the one that is swimming in the sea of Azov
In fact, Russia's strategy and tactics are passive, it is the way of playing tricks, what moves the United States and Europe make, they want to deal with them, this is the case on the battlefield, especially on the economic front, when can Russia not be passive? Not good to say.
This special military operation can be described as a costly effort, the battle line is too long, it really means to cut the Donbass out of Ukraine, if Russia really does this, it will win. In my opinion, it is not necessarily the consequence of such dismemberment of Ukraine that the United States and Europe will sanction Russia for another twenty or thirty years, fifty or sixty years. Obviously, this is not what Russia wants, and the post-war scars are healed and rebuilt, which requires Russia to spend more financial resources.
The Azov steel mill was bombed
Now on the battlefield of Russia and Ukraine, it is a word of "consumption", to see who can consume whom? If you want to end the war, you can only talk to the United States and talk to Ukraine. If you keep being so stiff and consuming, you will definitely consume the big killer.
Future Directions:
1. Ukraine is cut alive, and may leave a little sea outlet for it, because the United States needs this sea exit.
2. Poland, this guy who doesn't have a long memory, wants to get involved in profits, and says that Poland doesn't care about the territory of Ukraine, which is really false. Why is there a "Wave-U" alliance in the world? This is certainly not out of thin air. In fact, Poland is most worried about Russia winning, because geographically, if there is no Ukrainian buffer, the first to be affected by Russia is Poland. So it has to make a move, forcing the United States to intervene and lay Russia down.
3. Finland and Sweden are in a tight spot to join NATO on the line of fire. If NATO is really stupid enough to accept these two countries at once, it will be easier for Russia to increase its efforts.
4. Russia has turned Europe upside down with oil and gas. No matter how rich Europe is, it cannot withstand such a big deal as the United States. By creating tensions in Europe, the United States aims to control Europe. By lowering the euro to maintain the hegemony of the dollar, the current exchange rate between the euro and the dollar has fallen to 1:1. Then there is the soaring energy prices, the high-intensity inflation in the United States is about to explode, and this time the United States has chosen Europe as a breakthrough to divert inflation. It is also necessary for Europe to experience this taste, so that they will not be fooled behind the Scenes in the United States.
In summary, the real "big fish" is still the future action of the United States, not only for Russia, but also for Europe, and of course, for China.