Wen | has a small bell pepper (the original is not easy, please do not copy, welcome to personal reprint and share)
Figure| source network (if there is infringement, please contact to delete)
What is a "cyber storm"? Internet violence is the abbreviation of "network violence", internet violence refers more to a person out of nothing, fabricate facts, exaggerate facts, expand bad influence, so that a person is in a long-term tense mental pressure.
People who encounter Internet violence are often public figures, or people who have entered the public eye because of a special event.
Only people who enter the public eye, including people of all ages, including children, are likely to encounter Internet violence.
"Internet violence" is the product of network development, network development has brought opportunities to some people, but also brought side effects to these people, so only if the heart is strong enough, can it be open in the network, because we simply can not control the mouth of others, nor can we unify the quality of netizens.
The network environment is noisy, people of all qualities are there, netizens are in the dark, and it is precisely because of this that it is easier to breed Internet violence.
The smallest Internet celebrity "Fart Peach Qiqi" was spat on ugly, is it considered an Internet storm?
With the development of the short video industry, children's opportunities have increased, which may not be a bad thing for parents, but for some children, it must not be a good thing. Internet celebrities are gradually becoming young, from children voluntarily to children becoming famous in the internet unconsciously, which is something worth thinking about.
There is a child on the Internet who does not conform to the aesthetics of the public, a small one-eyed, chubby face, and a collapsed nose bridge, which is "Fart Peach Qi Qi", he is completely on fire, with more than 9 million fans and a lot of attention.
But because of the attention, so all kinds of voices have come out, many people complain that he is too ugly, there are other people who say that there should be no "Internet violence" of a child like this.
And these netizens who say their true feelings in their hearts do not buy it: ugly looks are not let people say? Ugly, this is a fact, this is also a network violence? So are you going to shut up? Since you are afraid of being called ugly, what is the point of letting your child appear on camera at such a young age? Since you can't withstand this kind of public opinion pressure, why do you want your children to come out and make money?
Since the child has become a tool to make money, parents must consider the consequences
When a child is said to be "ugly" is really not an Internet violence, when a child has millions of fans, it has become the object of attention of many netizens, there will be likes, there will be spit, "ugly" is just a real evaluation of some people's hearts.
I believe that parents also understand the appearance of a child, and there is also an objective evaluation of the child's appearance, but the child has his own characteristics, so there will be so many people to have relationships, such as the "childish" feeling on the "fart peach Qi Qi", which will make people feel very interesting.
Is the child's little video on the public network for the sake of the baby? Of course not, parents are selfish, especially when a child has become a "figure" at the level of Internet celebrities, the income is quite considerable, which is the motivation of parents to show their babies.
It is precisely because of the existence of interests that parents ignore their children's feelings.
Some parents have their own interests, regardless of their children's health, let their children record and eat, and some parents let their young children be models and work for more than 8 hours...
Parents do not hesitate to withdraw their children for money, and they should think that their children are bound to encounter various public opinion evaluations, and even fall into "Internet violence".
Therefore, this decision of the parents from the beginning is wrong.
Adults still can't stand some of the comments on the Internet, let alone children? At a certain stage, children may not feel the presence of Internet violence, because they have not yet touched the Internet, but when the baby grows up and starts to play with his mobile phone, they will clearly see the evaluation of him.
It's hard to imagine what a child will have after seeing those unfriendly comments.
It is not the netizens who "pit" the child, but the parents of the child.
The more open the times, the more you should protect your children
If the child has talent, for example, the child has the talent to perform, record some imitation videos for the child, let the child save a certain popularity, and lay a good foundation for the child's future performance road, which is definitely a good thing.
But at the same time, parents must protect the privacy of their children's personal lives, parents should first make their hearts strong, be able to accept different evaluations of children from the outside world, and automatically block those unfriendly voices.
Secondly, it is necessary to have a difference between the primary and secondary, to shoot videos for children is secondary, do not let the interests blind the eyes, affecting the growth of children. Children's learning and school life are the main thing, any child may cross the level of growth, they will only grow up on time if they have experienced what they should experience.
Don't focus on the short-term interests in front of you, the growth of the child is more critical, childhood is a one-way train, missed is missed forever.
In the era of network openness, there is a very interesting imagination, the elderly and children are most likely to be concerned in the short video industry, which is why, there is a saying on the Internet that "nibbling on the old" before, now "nibbling on the small", young people can really calculate.
It is precisely because there are many successful cases that more and more parents are eager to try and put their children in a position that is commented on.
What I want to remind parents here is that the more open the online environment is, the more they should protect their children, unless parents are fully prepared.