laitimes

Nike Five vs Adi Five Which side is stronger? After comparison, it was found that some people were overrated

Today's NBA really lacks star flavor, basically pay attention to high-traffic stars, are thirty years old, young players are really bad. The development of local players has also entered a bottleneck, which can be seen from the fact that MVPs have been taken away by foreign stars in succession. In the past, the NBA really didn't do this, it was really star-studded, "Adi Five Tigers" and "Nike Five Tigers" are the idols of many people. So if these two groups play against each other, which side will be stronger, you have the answer after analysis.

Nike Five vs Adi Five Which side is stronger? After comparison, it was found that some people were overrated

Many people see the Nike Five tigers and think that they are more powerful, after all, there are Kobe, James, Irving, George, Durant, all of them are top scorers. Especially James, Kobe Bryant, Durant, they really want to let go of the offense really no solution exists.

Nike Five vs Adi Five Which side is stronger? After comparison, it was found that some people were overrated

We admit that the Nike Five are strong enough, but this time it was really high, because in front of the Adi Five Tigers, they were still almost there. The Adi Five Tigers are Duncan, Garnett, Maddie, Billups, and Arenas.

First of all, Garnett and Duncan's internal combination, that is both offensive and defensive integration, they can beat the Nike Five Tigers. Then Maddy is the perfect forward guard swingman, Billups is the master of control, he belongs to the strength is greater than the fame. As for Arenas, that's the "Great General", his killer ball is too classic, and he is also the only god to score 60 points on Kobe's head.

Nike Five vs Adi Five Which side is stronger? After comparison, it was found that some people were overrated

Nike Five Tigers and Adi Five Tigers, the outside attack is evenly divided, you can even say that the Nike Five tigers are stronger, but the gap between the inside line is too big. As far as Duncan and Garnett's inner line is concerned, it can blow up the Nike Five Tigers inside line. Don't look at James and Durant, let them directly against Duncan and Garnett, that must be a big loss, on the height gap is a hard injury.

Nike Five vs Adi Five Which side is stronger? After comparison, it was found that some people were overrated

The Adi Five Tigers lineup is more reasonable, can be inside and outside, and the ball can be distributed more reasonably. The Nike Five tigers are pure attackers, and even if James organizes, the ball is a problem. And Irving's defense is the biggest shortcoming of all of them, and it is easy to be targeted.

So it is concluded that if the "Adi Five Tigers" and "Nike Five Tigers" are in the opposite position, the "Adi Five Tigers" are stronger and the winning side is also greater, what do you think?

Nike Five vs Adi Five Which side is stronger? After comparison, it was found that some people were overrated

Read on