Source: Yangguang Military, Chinese Military
From April 6 to 7 local time, the NATO Foreign Ministers' Meeting was held in Brussels, belgium, and four countries in the Asia-Pacific region - Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea - were invited to participate for the first time. Before the meeting, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg publicly declared that NATO's new strategic concept would "consider China's influence for the first time." This series of actions related to the Asia-Pacific region by the United States cannot help but make people question whether NATO's tentacles will reach out to China's neighbors. According to foreign media reports, the United States is preparing to transfer the biological experiment agency in Ukraine to Mongolia, mainly to study the "impact of dangerous viruses on Asian races." So, if the United States does this, what kind of disaster will it bring to the Asia-Pacific region? Please pay attention to the "National Defense Time and Space" - South Military Forum.
On April 7, local time, the NATO Foreign Ministers' Meeting was held in Brussels, Belgium. (China News Network)
Zhou Yuting: As we all know, NATO's crazy eastward expansion is considered to be the "bane" of the Russian-Ukrainian dispute. Today, NATO seems to have hit China's mind while providing a steady stream of military and economic assistance to prop up the Ukrainian government to continue a "proxy" war against Russia. Last week's NATO foreign ministers' meeting invited south Korea, Japan, Australia and New Zealand, four non-NATO member states located in the Asia-Pacific region, to participate in the meeting, which triggered heated public opinion.
South Korean media believe that this shows that NATO is trying to expand its external scope. Japanese media reported that NATO wants to deepen cooperation with Asia-Pacific countries to prevent China from supporting Russia. Some analysts believe that this meeting may become an opportunity for NATO to participate in the US-led Indo-Pacific strategy.
Professor Yinan, is it that NATO's eastward expansion in Europe can no longer satisfy its appetite, and it still wants to use the Russian-Ukrainian dispute to recruit Asia-Pacific countries to join the "circle"?
Jin Yinan: Some so-called international organizations in the world believe that if there is no war, no refugees, no people displaced, no towns destroyed into ruins, it feels that there is no need to exist, NATO is such an organization.
Recently, NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg has been very active, and at the recent NATO Foreign Ministers' Meeting, he invited for the first time four Partners in the Asia-Pacific region, South Korea, Japan, Australia and New Zealand, to attend the meeting, which can clearly see the trend of NATO's eastward expansion to the Asia-Pacific region. In fact, NATO has just emerged from a crisis. What is this crisis? It is its own existential crisis.
In 2016, after trump was elected president of the United States, he vowed to abolish NATO. He argues that NATO is an outdated military organization that has swallowed up a lot of U.S. taxpayer money that could have been used for U.S. infrastructure. French President Emmanuel Macron also said in 2019 that NATO has been "brain dead". What is "brain death"? It is lying there with only a heartbeat and a breath, but no thoughts. The Questioning of NATO by the United States, coupled with the doubts of France, once put NATO in jeopardy.
The period from 2016 to 2019 can be said to be the trough period of NATO. At that time, many NATO employees, including high-ranking NATO officials like Stoltenberg, who were highly paid by NATO, worried all day long that they would be fired, and spent all day calculating how long NATO would last. How long can he stay in the position of Secretary-General? Now, at the constant instigation of the US-led NATO, the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has finally broken out, and NATO has begun to provide a steady stream of weapons to Ukraine, hoping that Russia will fall into the "quagmire of Ukraine". Not only that, NATO also jumped out to accuse China, saying that China may aid Russia, and thus have a series of bad influences, so it must unite with other countries to put pressure on China.
At the current MEETING of NATO foreign ministers, he also specially pulled over several non-NATO member states located in the Asia-Pacific region, with a posture of intimidation, which on the surface seemed to be exerting pressure on China, but in fact showed the momentum of eastward expansion in the direction of the Asia-Pacific region. This trend of NATO deserves our high vigilance.
As we all know, NATO, a military organization that should have died a long time ago, has brought only conflicts, wars and refugees to the international community for many years. And once this organization smells the smoke of war, the smell of war, just like the bloodthirsty beast smells of blood, it behaves very actively, very positively. The current trend of this organization deserves our high vigilance, and the hidden purpose behind it deserves our solemn attention.
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg attends a press conference in Brussels, Belgium, April 5 (Global Network)
Zhou Yuting: According to reports, in addition to the Russia-Ukraine dispute, there is also a key agenda for the NATO Foreign Ministers' Meeting, which is to discuss and formulate a new strategic concept for NATO. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg claimed at a press conference before the meeting that the concept "will take into account for the first time China's growing influence and coercive policies on the global stage" and once again clamored that China poses a so-called "systemic challenge" to NATO's security and democracy.
Some netizens left a message saying that NATO has been arching fire all day long to provoke and undermine peace and stability, but it shouts that it is seriously threatened, which is a typical "persecution paranoia." Indeed, NATO has not touched China once or twice. Stoltenberg made it clear last year that NATO's strategic focus would shift to focusing on the "China threat." So, after listening to his words and looking at his deeds, can we conclude that NATO regards China as the number one hostile target in the future?
Jin Yinan: I think that for a long time to come, NATO's number one target will still be Russia, and NATO will not give up until Putin is removed from power or Russia is divided. In the eyes of the West, in the eyes of NATO, Russia, with a territory of more than 17 million square kilometers and very rich resources, will always be the nightmare of the West and NATO. Therefore, until Russia is dismembered, NATO has no time to look east.
But if NATO succeeds through the Russian-Ukrainian dispute, both removing Putin from power and dividing Russia, NATO will have no competitors in Europe. At that point, they are likely to see China as a strategic adversary, because in NATO's view, "a growing China poses a major threat to the world economy, science and technology, the military, including the political system and the form of civilization."
But I think this is just wishful thinking on NATO' part, because NATO is old today, and although it has a big appetite, how long it will live is a big question.
How long will NATO live? I think it's based on how far Europe can wake up. Germany and France have long wanted to form an EU force and fly NATO. In the recent French election, Macron's opponent Le Pen is now very close to Macron's vote. Le Pen said that if she came to power, the first thing she would do was to get France to withdraw from NATO. France had withdrawn from NATO, and in 1966, then-President Charles de Gaulle announced France's withdrawal from NATO, so the headquarters of NATO had to be moved from Paris, France, to Brussels, the capital of Belgium.
So, NATO, the organization, is menacing on the surface, but what is actually the situation? It is that it has struggled, there are many problems inside, and the key is to see when these problems break out. I don't believe that this organization can maintain its vitality forever, can expand indefinitely, and eventually become a global organization.
Because no matter what, peaceful development has always been the main theme of the world today, NATO as a military organization, a war organization, an organization that creates conflicts everywhere, as mankind truly enters the era of peaceful development, what is the value of its existence? What's the point? I think its fate can only be to disappear gradually, slowly to the end.
Infographic: A U.S.-funded laboratory in Kiev, Ukraine (World Wide Web)
Zhou Yuting: Since the escalation of the Dispute between Russia and Ukraine, Russia has repeatedly exposed a large amount of evidence of the US biological military activities in Ukraine. There is evidence that these biomilitary studies include the development of pathogens that target only people with certain racial and ethnic genetic characteristics as "biological weapons against different races". In the face of widespread doubts from the international community, the United States has not yet made an explanation, but urgently shipped all research results, strains and pathogen samples from Ukraine.
According to foreign media reports, the United States is preparing to transfer its closed biological experimental institutions in Ukraine to Mongolia, and the main research area of these institutions may be "the impact of dangerous viruses on Asian races." In this regard, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ordzhonik analyzed that if the biological plans in Ukraine are aimed at the Slavs, then in Mongolia, these plans may be aimed at Chinese.
Professor Yinan, what do you think of the United States' repeated use of the land of other countries as a biological military research experimental ground and its disregard for the safety of people's lives, health and safety?
Jin Yinan: After the end of World War II, the United States received a number of German and Japanese scientists who studied biological weapons, including all the data of The Japanese "Unit 731" conducting human experiments in northeast China. Therefore, when the victorious powers were trying Japanese war criminals in World War II, Shiro Ishii, the commander of "Unit 731", was not tried. The reason was that he gave the United States a full set of materials on the human experiments conducted by "Unit 731" in northeast China, and the United States exempted him from trial as a war criminal, but only treated him as an ordinary prisoner of war.
We must pay attention to the recent preparations of the United States to transfer its closed biological experimentation agency in Ukraine to Mongolia. Because the Mongol race is considered to be the origin of Asians, the United States built a biological laboratory in Mongolia to study the genetic map and gene sequence of Asians, with extremely sinister intentions. The United States is definitely not because Asians have any disease, it wants to treat people and save people. The purpose of the United States is to see what defects are in the genes of Asians, where they are most vulnerable to attack, and where they are most likely to change. This is by no means the sci-fi, imagination and alarmist rhetoric of the future. Virus research conducted by U.S. biological laboratories for specific human species is a very risky behavior.
Let's ask another question, is the COVID-19 epidemic that continues to this day a biological warfare? Not long ago, the British media disclosed that the United States Modena Laboratory once published a gene fragment, which is highly similar to the gene fragment found by the new crown virus now, almost exactly the same. Moreover, in the Delta virus and the Omikejong virus, the gene fragment that the Modena laboratory had published was also found.
According to the British Sky News, whether it is Delta virus or Omicros virus, the probability of self-generation is only a few trillion, which is very small and the probability is extremely low, so some people speculate that the new crown virus is likely to be part of biological warfare. After the British media reported, the United States has not yet made any explanation.
We may wish to make a hypothesis, if the Western media found that some of the genetic fragments of the new crown virus were published by the Russian laboratory, I think Western public opinion will definitely hype, and will definitely say that the new crown virus is made in Russia. But now, what we are seeing is that the Modena Company in the United States has remained silent until now, and the American media has been silent, not mentioning this matter at all, and asking the western media not to report on this matter. So from these indications, we have every reason to doubt what the United States is doing on THE COVID-19 issue today.
Now that the United States wants to relocate the biology laboratory to Mongolia, will it be to create a new type of virus that is only targeted at yellow people and is highly lethal to the Mongolian race through genetic research, but can be basically immune to white people? If this is the case, it is a great threat to human beings. We must prevent this from happening.
(Produced by Yangguang Military and China Military)