Redmi, true self, iQOO these three mid-range machines have been released, of which the Redmi K50 selling point 2K screen, 2399, true me GT Neo3 selling point 150W fast charge, 2699, in the face of these two Tianji 8100 models, iQOO Neo6 chose to bet on the Snapdragon 8Gen1.
Snapdragon 8 in terms of parameters, performance and positioning are ahead of Tianji 8100, but the current user evaluation of Tianji 8100 is better, in terms of frame rate stability and power consumption of the game, this Tianji mid-range core is better, so Snapdragon 8 down to 2000 gears can not achieve dimensionality reduction, but it is indeed a strong selling point, especially for ordinary users who do not pay attention to mobile phones.
In addition, the ISP of Snapdragon 8 is far superior to that of Tianji 8100, coupled with the manufacturer's tuning of the Qualcomm platform is more mature, and the iQOO Neo6 theory is stronger than the other two in terms of photography, even if it uses an older CMOS. (64 million GW1P + 12 million ultra-wide angle + 2 million black and white)
iQOO Neo6 screen is a 1080P Samsung E4 hard screen, the chin is relatively wide, compared to GT Neo3's diamond-like flexible OLED Pegasus screen, there is not much advantage in feeling, not to mention comparing the K50's Samsung E4 2K screen.
As for others, there are bilinear motors (above the Z axis, X axis below), dual pressure sensor screens, infrared also, 80W + 4700 mAh combination, more good is that it has a plain leather version.
In contrast, iQOO Neo6 is 300 ~ 400 yuan more expensive than the other two, in addition to the processor, there is not much advantage, the overall look is a bit off the game phone, the cost performance is decent. So which do you think is more fragrant, two thousand 2K screens, 150W fast charge, Snapdragon 8Gne1?