Recently, Huawei's chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou attended Huawei's annual financial report conference, and throughout the meeting, the "good news" about Huawei came out one after another, such as Huawei's net profit increased by 75.9% year-on-year, Huawei has passed through the "black barrier area", etc., but some people with ulterior motives have focused on Ms. Meng Wanzhou's brooch.
It is understood that the brooch brand worn by Meng Wanzhou at the press conference is Van Cleef & Arpels, with a market price of 99,000 yuan, which is a luxury brand from France. In addition, some people also calculated the price of the bracelet worn by Meng Wanzhou this time to 63,300 yuan, plus the black dress of the DIOR brand, worth 27,000 yuan.
It is because of this kind of wearing collocation, Meng Wanzhou has been pushed into the "headlines" of everyone's hot discussion, some people say that Meng Wanzhou should not wear foreign luxury brands, should buy domestic products, and some people say that Meng Wanzhou should not be so high-profile and luxurious, should be low-key and simple, obviously, these are the excuses that are difficult for strong people.
Meng Wanzhou has long been huawei's CFO, and now he has been upgraded to rotating chairman, whether in terms of income or wearing taste, he is very accessible, not to mention that everyone has a heart for beauty, how Meng Wanzhou matches clothes is completely a matter of personal preference, so this issue itself has no value and significance to discuss. If I had to say, it can only be said whether it was appropriate to wear it on such a formal occasion, obviously, at this point, there is no point of complaint.
Secondly, on the question of whether Ms. Meng Wanzhou should buy domestic clothing and jewelry, although there is a hint of discussion significance, but this is by no means a reason to criticize Meng Wanzhou, we all know that in the field of luxury goods, most brands are from Europe, and domestic brands pay attention to cost performance, so even if Meng Wanzhou wants to buy domestic brands of the same value, it may not be able to buy it.
Finally, on such a grand occasion, Meng Wanzhou wore valuable ornaments to attend, one is to express respect and attention to the conference, and the other is to reflect the state of Huawei's phoenix nirvana.
Therefore, in response to this "scolding war", the editor believes that some people with ulterior motives deliberately took out a trick to stir up dissension, whether it is Meng Wanzhou or Huawei, the determination to adhere to independent scientific research has not changed, the only change is that Huawei has a little more understanding of the suppressors.
Next, Meng Wanzhou will perform the duties of Huawei's rotating chairman, and it can even be said that Meng Wanzhou will represent Huawei next, so at this time, some people criticize Meng Wanzhou is criticizing Huawei, which is obviously an ulterior motive.
A person who truly agrees with Huawei and supports domestic technology will never evaluate a company on the food and clothing of a person, because the conclusions drawn in this way are often wrong and unrealistic, Meng Wanzhou is still the person who is admired by the Chinese people, and Huawei is still the benchmark of mainland technology companies.
In the past three years, Meng Wanzhou has maintained Huawei's dignity, and under the restrictions on the Canadian side's freedom, she has not exchanged any information from Huawei for freedom, and even Ren Zhengfei has said that she is ready to never see her daughter. Huawei's every move has touched the people of china and safeguarded the dignity of the motherland, and they do not owe anyone, so we do not need to ask others to do everything.
In the next 10 years, the change of domestic technology still needs Huawei's leadership, especially when foreign companies try to swallow the domestic high-end market, many times we can only count on Huawei to repel it, which is Huawei's role.
To make a simple analogy, the West has planted an Internet tree, and domestic Internet companies are building nests on this tree, and once the owner of this tree wants to throw away the nests of these domestic Internet companies, it is also a matter of reproach. Now, Huawei has also planted an Internet tree in China to escort the future development of domestic Internet companies.
For such a Huawei, what else can we be picky about?