With the increase of two-child and three-child families, everyone's space demand for cars has further improved, and the visibility of MPV is significantly higher after school. For us ordinary people, Alpha and GL8 are not very realistic, but everyone definitely needs a nanny car for family use in their lives. About 100,000 models are relatively high audience areas, ordinary consumers can also afford the cost of these models, and in this price point, Trumpchi M6, Wuling Capgemini is a hot product, then who is more attractive of these two cars? Or from the perspective of the consumer, who is more worthy of these two cars?
(Trumpchi M6)
in Capgemini
The guidance price range of the entire Trumpchi M6 series is 10.98-15.98 million, the entire series of models uses 1.5T engines, the wuling Capgemini series of guidance price range is 8.58-12.58 million (excluding the customized version), and the entire series of models also uses 1.5T engines (high and low power). In terms of price, the threshold of trumpchi M6 is slightly higher, but the two cars as a whole also meet our "100,000 price point" standard. Let's take trumpchi M6 2021 PRO 270T DCT Deluxe Edition (129,800) and Wuling Capgemini 2022 280T 1.5T automatic flagship (125,800) as examples to see the performance of the two cars.
Even if trumpchi M6 and Capgemini are both family cars, in the context of consumer rejuvenation, everyone will pay more attention to the appearance of the two cars. The overall shape of trumpchi M6 is decent, but the proportion is very coordinated, the whole vehicle uses a large number of straight lines, highlighting the family temperament, but the large size grille also has the basic domineering; Capgemini's body line is more sharp, showing a three-dimensional sense, while Capgemini also uses split headlights, suspension roof and other designs, the overall presentation of a strong sense of fashion.
Interior part, Trumpchi M6 adopts a layout similar to the "double screen", the visual effect is more exquisite, a large number of physical buttons in the center console can take into account the convenience, the gears placed in the center console can also leave more storage space for the front row, the practicality is good, the overall sense of grade is basic; Capgemini uses a suspension central control screen, and the gap between the central control screen and the instrument table presents a stepped layout, the sense of hierarchy is good, of which the console also retains some of the physical buttons, the convenience is not bad, and the overall emphasis is more on the sense of science and technology.
Talking about the interior, let's take a look at the configuration difference between the two cars, and since the guidance price of both cars is more than 120,000, let's focus on the intelligent technology configuration. In terms of intelligent driving, Trumpchi M6 only has a fixed speed cruise function, while Capgemini supports full-speed adaptive cruise, and has an active braking function; in terms of intelligent networking, Trumpchi M6 supports mobile phone interconnection, while Capgemini is equipped with Ling OS Lingxi system, OTA upgrade function, and can achieve online navigation, mobile PHONE APP control, voice interaction and other functions. In contrast, Capgemini will be more considerate in terms of functionality.
Space is naturally the first productive force of the two cars, and it is also the part that everyone values more. In terms of size, by consulting the configuration table, it can be seen that the length, width, height and wheelbase of Trumpchi M6 and Capgemini have advantages and disadvantages, and Capgemini will have advantages in terms of length. At the same time, the Trumpchi M6 uses a 7-seat layout, while Capgemini has a 6-seat layout, the former can carry more people, and the latter is more comfortable. Since the size of both cars is relatively large, the front space is naturally beyond doubt, and both can meet daily use. At the same time, Capgemini's main car has more electric adjustment and seat heating functions.
The second row of free seats is the essence of both cars, and the independent seats of both cars have a natural advantage in terms of comfort. The second row of seats of the Trumpchi M6 supports front and rear and backrest adjustment, while capgemini's second row of seats support front, rear, left and right, backrest and leg rest adjustment, which has richer adjustment functions and naturally better comfort.
In the third row of seats, the Trumpchi M6 has 3 seats, while Capgemini has 2 seats. But because the size of the two cars has not reached an exaggerated level, the third row is more of an emergency. Relatively speaking, the Trumpchi M6 can accommodate more crew members, while Capgemini's space will be more stretched.
In terms of trunks, the Trumpchi M6 and Capgemini's third row of seats are supported to be stored under the floor, which is what we often call a hidden layout, which needs to be praised by both cars. In terms of data, trumpchi M6 trunk volume is 324-1100L, Capgemini is 482-1514L, there is some gap between the two.
Finally, let's take a look at the power performance of the two cars, trumpchi M6 1.5T engine maximum power of 124kW, maximum torque of 265N·m, for a 1.5T engine, its power parameters are not bad, matched with a 7-speed wet dual clutch transmission, the vehicle NEDC fuel consumption of 7.5L/100km; Capgemini's 1.5T engine maximum power of 130kW, maximum torque of 290N·m, compared to Trumpchi M6 has some advantages, It is matched with a CVT gearbox, and the fuel consumption of the vehicle NEDC is 7.6L/100km.
Summary: Family cars must first look at practicality, and at this point, Trumpchi M6 and Capgemini can get praise, both of which have a good ride space and trunk space, and there are few opponents in the same class of models, but Capgemini's rear seat function and trunk advantages will be particularly prominent. In terms of configuration, the basic configuration of Trumpchi M6 is not bad, while Capgemini's intelligent technology configuration is more abundant; in terms of power, the economy of both cars is not bad, but Capgemini's power output is slightly stronger. Overall, if you pay more attention to the cost performance, then Capgemini will be a better choice.