Let's share my experience this month
In addition to supporting newbies, headlines will also suppress newbies.
Let me give two examples of my own
Example 1: Two articles with almost the same data have several times the difference in returns, one unit price is 7 cents, and one unit price is more than 1 gross.
One of the two articles is before withdrawal and the other is after withdrawal. After the withdrawal, the unit price of the previous reading dropped significantly.
Example 2: I don't know what will happen to you when you encounter a popular article. What I have encountered is that when the reading volume is about 5000, and the ratio of reading to impression is higher than about 10:1, I must receive a notification as shown in Figure 3 below, and it is suspected that there is content that is easy to cause bad associations, thus limiting my presentation and reading.
The appeal was also not passed, modified to a completely unsuitable, ninety percent or not, no sensitive words, no problem with the title.
I checked the review mechanism and said that the preliminary review is a machine, and there will be a second manual review when the article shows a high reading volume. That is to say, because I am a novice account, the number of fans is low, and the secondary reviewers will not let me have further benefits.
The thought of spending hours sorting out and editing articles that I didn't recommend was getting less and less motivated
