The day before yesterday, an author did not understand the essence of the refraction 1 corner, and wrote an answer to the question "Why is it said that the refractive shadow corner has the most value and potential in the collection of four editions of banknotes" (see Figure 1), which makes people laugh.
Figure-1
He spoke thousands of words, the whole family, regardless of logic and basis, so that we did not look 1/3, we were already in the clouds. The format of the article is quite formal, the beginning and end are divided into a preface, a conclusion, and the middle is divided into one, two, three or four parts, telling you how to look, what to do, as if collecting old experts to think of themselves, pointing out the mysteries for all sentient beings.
First, is the refractive shadow 1 corner a fluorescent coin?
At the beginning of the article "Preface" (see Figure 2), he pre-made a modest foreshadowing: "First of all, it may also be because I am not deeply involved in the study of the four editions of coins, and I do not know much about the refractive shadow version."
Figure-2
But at the crucial point, he was not modest enough, and said: "Of course you have to say the subdivision version... But this kind of thing is not without substitutes, take this what refractive shadow 1 corner, who will be okay with fluorescent light" (see Figure-3).
The meaning of his words is very clear: refractive 1 dime is a fluorescent coin! It's a subdivision again, so there are alternatives! So, what exactly is the refractive 1 angle? Is there a "replacement" for it?
Figure-3
Yes, Refractive 1 Corner is a subdivision version, independent of the 8001-3 Crown series, but it is not a fluorescent coin!
According to the official "Talking about Money and Saying Coins" (published by the Central Literature Compilation and Publishing House in 2017), the upper right corner of the front of the refractive 1 dime banknote "adopts metal bright ink" (which belongs to the new patented technology at that time), and "prints the refractive latent shadow anti-counterfeiting mark" one by one "1" characters.
Empirical research shows that this "1" word does not have a fluorescent reaction, and no fluorescent lamp is needed to illuminate it. This is the "1" character printed by metallic glossy ink, which is reflected under the refraction of natural light at a certain angle, but can be seen clearly by the naked eye alone (this is called anti-counterfeiting "one glance clear" in the collection world), rather than reflected and seen by fluorescent irradiation.
You know, even if it is a fluorescent coin, different fluorescent varieties can be strictly distinguished, such as the 801 Golden Dragon King and the 902 Green Ghost, it is completely irreplaceable! Moreover, in all 8001-3, these 300,000 refractive 1 corners have independent anti-counterfeiting features that others do not have, and there is no "substitute".
Obviously, the author hastily and mistakenly believes that the refractive 1 corner is a fluorescent coin variety, and there is a "substitute" that does not clarify the "what" of the refractive 1 corner, so the refractive 1 corner is confused with the fluorescent coin, and even with the ordinary 1 corner. This is not the first time such a joke has been made in the world of paper money collecting. It is just that excellent expert writers are so rash and write jokes to spread, which is enough to mislead and harm the vast number of ordinary collectors, which is really wrong and shocking.
What is the relationship between the large amount of banknotes in the second and fourth editions and the amount of refractive 1 corner?
Logical thinking common sense tells us that without figuring out "what", we are not qualified to talk about "why" and "how".
However, after some natural discussion, in the "Conclusion" (see Figure 4) part of the article, he concentrated on another thesis: "Regardless of whether this version of the one corner (referring to the refractive 1 corner) can become the king of the four versions of the coin", "I will not touch, after all, the amount of the four versions of the coin is very large, and the hype is still more difficult."
We also save the curve, which he calls scaring people. He directly applied the fact that the amount of coins in the four editions is very large and it is difficult to hype, directly to the refractive 1 corner, which can be said that the concept of size is not clear.
Figure-4
The overall number of four editions of coins can indeed be described by the word "huge". Many varieties, tens of millions of pieces, even hundreds of millions of pieces, hundreds of millions of pieces, speculation difficulties are also a fact.
Refractive 1 Corner is a four-edition, 17-piece independent edition and essential variety, and its number is only 300,000! It also exists only in the following 3 crown segments (see Figure-5):
M1D2700001-2800000
X2M5600001-5700000
C3M0550001-0650000
There are also some of the supplements in the three crowns of N0X, Z0L, and J0N (about 6000 pieces. Subject to the measured "1" character with refractive latent shadow anti-counterfeiting logo). Other than that, none of them are refractive 1 angles.
Figure-5
So, the original four editions of 14 large sets of more than 2 million sets, is it necessary to be equipped with a refractive angle to become the current four editions of 17 large sets (see Figure -6)? The answer is yes. It can be seen that 300,000 refractive pieces, with a ratio of 2.1 million sets of large sets, an average of 7 sets of large sets can have 1 refractive light and 1 corner!
Figure-6
Of course, from the existing demand situation and the desire to hold the currency of the refractive 1 corner, it is inferred that someone must hold the refractive 1 corner in large quantities and for a long time and not sell it. It is estimated that there will be 30 sets, 50 sets or even 100 sets of large sets, which can only be grabbed to a refractive 1 corner, staged more monks and less porridge, refractive refractive is difficult to find the tight supply and demand situation.
Do you also say that the refractive 1 angle is very large? No, the amount of refractive 1 angle is very small, even extremely small!