preface
At 19:00 Beijing time on February 13, the LPL Spring Tournament once again ushered in a focus battle, and the opponents of this game were LNG teams that won five consecutive games against the BRG teams that were also in excellent form. The BLG team achieved a record of 4 wins and 1 loss a year ago, although the BRG is not as dazzling as LNG's five-game victory in the record, but the game that BRG lost was also the last to fight with the current top RNG, and the strength should not be underestimated. So in this game, is it the BRG to give LNG the first defeat of the season, or the LNG to usher in six consecutive wins? Let's start with data analysis.
LNG and BLG data on field of view and resource control
On the field of view, BLG> LNG
From the comparison of the two teams of visual end data, on the basis of the same number of minute eye lines, the number of minute insertions of BLG is more than LNG, which shows that the attention and control of BLG in the field of vision is better than that of LNG.
Many people may see that the gap between the two teams' minutes is only 0.4, and feel that LNG is not much behind, in fact, combined with the average time spent in each game, the gap between the two teams is still quite large in the layout of the field of vision. LNG averages 31 minutes per field and BLG averages 32 minutes per game, and LNG lags behind BRG by an average of 3.7x32-3.3x31 = 16.1 eye positions per game in terms of field of view arrangement. These 16 eye positions are arranged into the canyon and can cover a considerable area. The BLG's control of the field of vision is no. 2 in the league, second only to the WBG, which has a tactical arrangement around the field of vision, and the advantage of the field of view for a strong team like the BLG can often be transformed into the control of neutral resources and finding a better breaking point for the team.
In terms of control, LNG > BLG
In terms of the control rate of the dragon, LNG is far ahead of the BRG with an average control rate of 55.6% per game, and the control rate of the BLG is not more than half of the dragon, which can also show that the BLG does not attach importance to the early dragons.
In my opinion, LNG's lead in the control of the dragon is mainly due to two reasons: on the one hand, because after LNG joined Doinb this season, the whole team has improved its linkage ability and response ability. Since the dragon is in the lower half of the zone, the participation rate of the middle and lower roads and the field position is crucial. The participation rate of Light and Tarzan is the first in the same position, while the participation rate of Zhongdan Donb is the second in the same position, second only to we are Zhongdan Shanks. The extremely high participation rate of these three people also shows that the LNG early play is more aggressive, and the neutral resources are also more important.
On the other hand, I think, lies in the tactical differences between the two sides. From the fact that the BLG pays more attention to the layout control of the field of view, we can probably see that the BLG is a team that tends to win the game in the later stage. The more obvious characteristics that support this argument can be learned from the choice of heroes of the middle unit Fofo this season. This season, Fofo has played 8 games in a total of 13 small games, such as clockwork and airplanes, so it is reasonable that BLG is not offensive enough in the competition between the first and middle dragons.
In terms of dragon control, LNG = BLG
In the control of the Big Dragon, the two teams are equally divided, both at the top level of the league. The BLG's excellence in the control of the Dragon mainly comes from the time point of the Dragon refresh, and the strong period of the BLG lineup began to arrive. The LNG's excellent control of the dragon is not only the good radiation of the team's early rhythm, but also the support of the team's strong team combat ability.
Comparison of LNG and BLG data on the offensive and defensive ends
On the offensive end, LNG > BLG
From the offensive end of the data, LNG in the average number of kills, minute damage and a tower rate, are better than BLG, but in the blood rate is not as good as BLG, which shows that in the overall offensive end LNG is better than BLG. The BLG's lead in the first blood rate shows that the BLG is better than the LNG in the early tactical layout and execution. But the less than the LNG tower rate also shows that although BRG can quickly get a blood, it lacks the means to expand the early advantages.
Defensive end, BLG > LNG
In terms of the average number of deaths per game, BLG averaged 9.6 deaths per game, which is lower than LNG's average of 9.8 per game, so LNG has done a better job on the overall defensive end. The BLG is better defensively, thanks to the control of the field of view on the one hand. On the other hand, thanks to the decisive execution of BLG tactics, it should be played when it should be played, and it should not be played when it is steadily developed, and it will seek a fatal opportunity to strike a blow in the later stage of the lineup.
LNG and BLG key player data comparison
To say that the game between LNG and BRG, the key players also have to look at the duel of the unit, and the single Fofo on both sides is very good at the late big core Carry type hero, which is the main output of the team. Doinb is very good at supportive and functional singles, and his wanderings often help the team find a breakthrough quickly. Let's take a look at the comparison of the personal data of the two people.
Offensively, Doinb > Fofo
On the offensive end, doinb's average kills and assists per game sum is: 3.6 + 7.2 = 10.8, while Fofo's average kills and assists per game sum is: 2 + 6.6 = 8.6. The difference in the data performance of the two on the offensive end is still obvious. In addition, Doinb has done a better job than Fofo in key minute replenishment, minute economy and minute output, so we can think that Doinb is better than Fofo on the offensive end.
Defensive end, Fofo > Doinb
In terms of deaths per game, Fofo is lower than Doinb's 1.8 deaths by averaging only 1.2 deaths per game, and it is clear that Fofo is doing a better job on the defensive end. In fact, Fofo also has good ability on the offensive end, but this season with the addition of Breathe and Doggo, Fofo in order to adapt to the needs of the lineup and tactics, the selected heroes are mostly late-stage big-core heroes, which is destined to Fofo in the first and middle periods will be relatively small. But the stability of the defensive end can also show that Fofo is a trustworthy single, can attack and defend, and the technology is very comprehensive.
Combining the overall data of the two, I think Doinb is better than Fofo, Doinb's value is not limited to the stability of the offensive and defensive ends, Doinb is also a single with its own system, excellent overall view and wandering ability, often can help the team open the situation in the first and middle periods.
epilogue
In summary, I think the odds of LNG are higher. Although on the defensive end, LNG is not as good as BRG, but the offensive end is good enough to inevitably bring more deaths, as long as these extra deaths can bring more resources and economy to LNG, it is worth it. LNG and BLG competition, I don't know who is more optimistic about who can win?