Saw a video today. A little girl was standing and playing in a subway seat, and the standing aunt said a few words to the child. Parents say, you say my child is right? Big mom said, can't your child say? Parents say, you see she occupies a position, right? Then I gave you my seat, why don't you sit? The aunt said, this child you do not educate, then I will educate.
This sentence sounds really domineering, and it feels particularly classic. It is said on the Internet that if you do not educate your child today, the society will educate him fiercely in the future. The child's mother obviously did not discipline the child well, and even if she gave up her seat, it was a mistake in the front. After the passenger blames the child, he pulls up the hard top of his throat, which is wrong and wrong. On the one hand, it makes people feel that there must be a mother and a daughter, because the parent is a mirror of the child. On the other hand, what the child receives in this moment is not love and protection. If the quarrel wins, it is condoning the child; if the quarrel is lost, it is fear. In either case, it is the child who hurts.
The training mother stands in the perspective of society, and gets more social support. But if you think about it, it's not all right. Children do not understand things, because parents do not understand things, directly with the child can not get by, then really think of themselves as society.
The child's education must be done well in advance, otherwise the society will make rules for him when he grows up. And now on this occasion, the child is innocent. Society can educate his parents, but do not directly educate his children, the child is still young, the harm is too great.