Anyway, the magic has changed, I will tell you what kind of story "Can't Pass Away" is

Because the series was renamed "Savage Growth", the introduction also has the saying of "the first bucket of gold". As the name suggests, it seems like an entrepreneurial story, right?

According to Anai's urine nature, the entrepreneurial story still has to carry a little confrontation policy, and even the bloodiness of the accumulation of primitive capital, so it is not good to pass the trial, right?

NO, all errors.

First of all, it's not an entrepreneurial story, it's a transformation story. It is a story of the opening heroine taking advantage of the situation to close the rags from the high-end version to the low-end version and take a step on the road to the industrialist.

If you change a title that is easy to understand, it is: Xu Banxia opened the factory.

Since you want to open a factory, you have to solve: land, transportation, technical problems, need to standardize management, of course, more importantly, money.

The two dates that collect the rags and make the upside-down grandfather cannot open the factory.

However, before all this is carried out, what Xu Banxia has to do is to formulate the direction, is it to continue to walk on the edge of legal morality, and to carry out barbaric growth wherever he passes? Or do you want to do a modern and standardized enterprise with orderly development?

Looking at the title of the play, do you think it is the former? NO, at least in the book, is the latter.

And all this is for two reasons: one is the "cannot be reborn" hanging in Xu Banxia's heart like a curse, and the other is Zhao Lei, who exists like a helmsman.

The relationship between Xu Banxia and Zhao Lei began with the appearance value, set on insight, and finally developed.

Xu Banxia is a paper bull with an engineering diploma and loves to see the factory, while Zhao Lei is a professional manager of a real foreign factory.

Zhao Lei, who was both academic and formal, was a person who would pull Xu Banxia back whenever he ran to the wild road.

Xu Banxia needs funds and comes up with the idea of selling Russian scrap steel, Zhao Lei introduced the state-owned factory as an intermediary to her, Xu Banxia looked up to the technical personnel in the northeast, Zhao Lei gave her a feasible plan, Xu Banxia wanted to buy a large factory, and Zhao Lei contacted the manufacturers in the middle.

Yes, in the book, there is no Xu Banxia who takes people to Russia to collect scrap steel, but cooperates with a state-owned factory in the north to pay the intermediary fee of the state-owned factory, which is collected by the state-owned factory.

Moreover, it is a hand to pay, a hand to deliver, integrity of the transaction.

The first dilemma at the beginning of the story is that in the case of the downturn in the steel market, Xu Banxia went bankrupt and was still in debt, and did not suffer any losses to the state-owned factories in good faith.

Do the fall, earn the difference, how much you earn, depends on how much the principal is. Therefore, Xu Banxia should increase the principal.

This is also the role of the high leap forward.

Gao Yuejin, the richest man in the city, is a capital tycoon in the company's listing process. Xu Banxia obtained a guarantee from Gao Yuejin through tong xiao riding soft rice. Increased principal.

It is worth mentioning that Gao Yuejin estimated that his face value was 20 million, while the bank only gave 5 million according to Xu Banxia's strength, and Xu Banxia did not ask for much.

Did you find it? From the beginning of the story, Xu Banxia's money is clean. Not only does it over-lend to pass on risk to banks, but also makes state-owned enterprises profitable, which is simply a model for capitalists in the new era.

Then, there's the technical issue.

If the whole book has a risk of review, then the not-so-clean Tong Xiao ride counts as one, and the trip to the dark northeast counts as one.

At present, Baidu Encyclopedia does not see people on the northeast line.

The trip to the northeast was a struggle for the technical backbone of the state-owned factories and for the dark capitalists whose hands and feet were extremely unclean.

In the end, Xu Banxia flickered on both heads and flicked the technical bull into his factory. It is also considered to solve the obstacle of land grabbing for the northeast gangster, which is the embodiment of the charm of the character, but this operation has very high requirements for the actor.

Xu Banxia here is not only a slippery adulterer, but also a former female hooligan who does not have unconventional means, and an ordinary woman who pities the old and cherishes the poor. It is the ultimate play of complex characters in complex environments.

Is it because the protagonist can't play out to cut or cut off, or not cut, there is no information at present, it is not easy to say, but it has been said that the review is troublesome, and the whole book is more troublesome at such a point.

The part that is not very clean, and that fits the definition of "savage growth", is at the beginning of the book.

At the beginning of the story, Xu Banxia took Tong Xiao riding out of prison, and Tong Xiao riding said that the government's people-friendly project made the land in the beach more conducive to aquaculture, and it was not easy for her to continue to renew the lease cheaply.

Therefore, Tong Xiao, who had just been released from prison, rode out of a "where he passed, there was no grass" - he met a person who transported waste oil in prison, let him pour oil on the beach, and destroyed the ecological environment of the beach.

The idea was ridden by Tong Xiao, and the person was found by Tong Xiao, xu Banxia agreed.

And this barbaric and destructive means of growth was exchanged for a curse of "not to be reborn" by the victims whose hopes were shattered.

At the same time, his career development is the last marginal event Xu Banxia did — bypassing supervision by means to let a parole criminal own a transportation company.

Why is it that in the book, Tong Xiaoqi is a marginalized, close to the dragon set of characters? Because, he is the most unclean person in the protagonist's square hand.

And in the play, to let the most unclean person in the whole book be the male protagonist, I don't know who will buckle the pot of the last evil thing in this barbaric growth period to!

If Xu Banxia is a ship that drives full horsepower, sets a good program, and marches towards the goal. Zhao Lei was the one who steered the helm. Most of the time he doesn't need to do anything, but once he's yawned, he can pull it back.

And when the ship docked, after the new sailor (Xiao Su) boarded the ship, Zhao Lei could also end the curtain.

The earth turtle and the foreign disk are destined to learn from each other for a while, and when the experience is collected, they are parting ways and looking for a new helmsman in their respective fields.

As for Tong Xiao riding, he still "grew wildly" on the beach that could not be resuscitated, and he could not drag it out with full horsepower - modern management made his brother uncomfortable and refused.

In the original work, Xu Banxia took a right path from the transformation of the barbaric growth girl to develop modernization and standardize the private industry, and finally, Xu Banxia opened a factory with excellent products in the beach that was polluted by Tong Xiaoqi and could not be farmed, benefiting the township under the guidance of civil servants and being recognized by the people.

When I was sorry to be so good and such a positive story to be adapted, it was actually changed to pull out a criminal who dominated the polluted beach road as the male protagonist, and at least three of the female fans ran to say that this original work must be changed, because it cannot pass the trial.

Where is this story not well examined? Female upside down grandpa to do business can not pass the trial? The unscrupulous capitalists who grow up barbarically cannot get through the trial when they find their conscience and benefit the township? Modern and standardized enterprises are not good to pass the review?

I know that there are people in the literary and art circles who feel that if they are not sad, not miserable, not dark, they are not worthy of being realist, nor are they necessarily prolific, but they just can't distinguish the difference between scar literature and realism. Aesthetic distortion, love of scar literature, criminal protagonists, and capital at hand, ordinary people should be garbage aesthetic hot eyes, but what is this matter?