DRX: Kim Jung-so proposes unmet salaries to make incomprehensible things during training sessions

Yesterday, the DRX team officially announced the termination of the contract with the former S8iG winning coach KIM, and then the DRX leader talked about the relevant position of coach Yu KIM through an online press conference. South Korean media INVEN made a news release on this press conference, mentioning that Kim Jung-so's supervision of the company's unmet matters are related to salary.

Original text to the effect:

Q: Has Kim Jung-so's supervision been officially terminated?

A: According to the decision of the board of directors, dismiss Kim Kyung-so as to supervise.

Q: Was the conflict between Representative Choi Sang-in and Supervisor Kim Jung-so one of the reasons for the termination?

A: No. Although there were differences of opinion, this was not a reason to terminate the contract. It is unrealistic to monitor the termination of a contract due to a disagreement with a company representative. It is not possible to cancel the contract unless there is a significant reason.

Q: If so, what are the big reasons?

A: Kim Jeong-so continues to require the DRX team to perform conditions that are difficult to fulfill in the direction of operation, and DRX was in a difficult situation to accept at the time. Due to the signing of a confidentiality agreement, it was not possible to elaborate on specific matters.

Q: Did Kim Kyung-so approve of DRX termination?

A: Received and confirmed the defense materials supervised by Kim Jung-so. It is difficult to say whether Kim Jung-so has accepted the termination of the contract, and it is not possible to say the specific details about the members of the board's disciplinary committee.

Q: Kim Jung-soo supervisor said that if DRX agrees he will disclose everything, will you agree to Kim Jung-soo's move?

A: No. Now is not the time for me to take a stand on his actions.

Q: Do the team members know that Kim Jung-so has been fired?

A: Regarding the termination of Kim Jung-so's supervision, I have different opinions on the matter of informing all the team members or listening to everyone's opinions. However, he spoke with captain Kim Hyuk-kyu about Kim Jung-so's decision to oversee the removal of the big list and the board.

Q: Does Kim Hyuk-kuei agree to dismiss Kim Kyung-so as to supervise him?

A: It was just a conversation, and it had nothing to do with the player's wishes.

Q: There should be players who joined the team after seeing the leadership supervised by Kim Jung-so, and there will also be players who do not want to have personnel changes during the season. Shouldn't the players be listened to?

A: Since this issue is between DRX and Kim Jung-so's supervision, I don't think it's something that needs to be discussed specifically with the players.

Q: There are legal issues with Kim Jung-so's dismissal. Do legal issues refer to social issues? Or a problem related to the LCK rules?

A: In a way, it may be related to both.

Q: Is the case so serious that the players are not listened to, and even if the roster changes during the season, the contract with the supervisor is terminated?

A: If there is no major violation, it is impossible to terminate the contract.

Q: If the reason for the termination of the contract cannot be made public, will it cause people to have more questions?

A: Actually this is a very difficult question to answer and cannot explain all this.

Q: In the case of the first four people being diagnosed with the new crown virus, what is the purpose of the press conference held by Kim Jung-so to supervise the dismissal?

A: The player's infection with COVID-19 has nothing to do with Kim Jung-so's dismissal. At this time, there were unexpected confirmed cases, but the time was determined before the announcement was issued, so it is somewhat regrettable.

Q: Curious whether the termination of a contract overseen by Kim Kyung-so falls under the umbrella of unprotected cases within the general sportsmanship category.

A: Because some of them are related to standard contracts, it is not possible to elaborate at this time. There were irregularities related to the content of the contract, and the violations were not improved.

Q: Does Choi Personally think that Kim Jung-so's supervision of the violation is enough for him to be fired?

A: This is the decision of the board of directors, and I think that there is no improvement in accordance with the above requirements, which has a big impact.

Q: Some of the factors that could lead to contract termination must have been background checked before the season, so why terminate the contract with the superintendent in the middle of the season?

A: In terms of contract-related matters, there are also intricate and alternating issues such as the team's attitude of non-cooperation and non-performance of duties. It can be told that the decision was made because he was absent from meetings within the team for no reason and did something incomprehensible during the training session.

Q: What are incomprehensible behaviors in training sessions?

A: There is no comment on this part.

Q: Does this mean that I did not participate in the training session?

A: No. But in a similar situation to some extent.

Q: Supervisor Kim Kyung-so said he received a notice of the removal list during the training session. This contradicts what you said about the situation?

A: Kim Jung-so supervises that he did not participate in the training session the day before the competition. And before that, Kim Jung-so has been notified to supervise.

Q: Did you inform Kim Jung-so that there was a press conference today?

A: Yes.

Q: Do I have to terminate my contract with Kim Kyung-so during the season?

A: It happened during the season and was unfortunate for the team. However, this decision would not have been made without serious reasons. Kim Jeong-so oversees and even asks to terminate the contract before the season through a mutual agreement, and Kim Jeong-so supervises a change of mind, so we didn't cancel the contract, but didn't comply with the requirements, so we terminated the contract. Kim Jung-so oversees repeated requests to the company that are difficult to meet.

Q: What are the requirements for Kim Jung-so's supervision?

A: That's not the part we can talk about. Because of the legal issues, it is difficult to say which part it is.

Q: Is there anything to do with Kim Jung-so's supervision requirements and salary?

A: In a way. Regarding salary, it is related to the legal part, and the team does not match.

Q: Is there anything to do with kim Jung-so's supervision requirements for the team and salary?

A: No, it's not.

Q: The contract has been completed, how can there be salary-related requirements?

A: It's a sensitive part, so it's hard to explain in detail.

Q: Will you accept Kim Jung-so's proposal to make everything public if the team agrees?

A: I won't.

Q: If we hold a press conference but don't disclose the specific reasons, will more and more people question this?

A: Nothing has changed for Kim Jung-so, so things can only go on like this. This is a legal issue, so it is difficult to elaborate, please understand.

Q: Kim Jung-so said he had not received notice of termination of the contract. When and in what way was the notice of termination of the contract notified?

A: He was notified through the email address supervised by Kim Jung-so. In the current situation, it is difficult to say the specific reasons for the termination of Kim Jing-so's supervision