Japan plans to dump 1 million tons of nuclear sewage into the sea, and South Korea protests: You even harm the fish in the Pacific Ocean! Will children be able to eat fish in the future? Recently, Japan has a plan to discharge nuclear sewage into the sea, and 1 million tons of sewage from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant are planning to flow into the sea, and local fishermen have collectively protested: children will not be able to eat money in the future! This is disastrous for the entire fishery, and Japanese environmentalists have also expressed opposition, the problem of fukushima nuclear sewage treatment in Japan is imminent, indeed can not be delayed any longer, now want to put more than 1 million tons of nuclear sewage containing radioactive material "tritium", directly diluted with seawater, discharged into the sea on time, the Japanese fisheries association strongly opposes.
The local people of Fukushima also strongly protested this, believing that this is a huge safety hazard, and this move has also aroused the concern of neighboring countries such as South Korea, where a large amount of seawater used to cool the reactor during the Fukushima nuclear accident, as well as groundwater and rainwater have been polluted, and after decontamination, they are kept in the nuclear power plant area and stored in storage tanks.
In fact, the radioactive material "tritium" in the water can not be removed at all, how to deal with these radioactive water, has become a big problem, in order to save time and effort discharged into the sea, then will be a pollution of the ocean, many related industries will also be affected, Fukushima residents and the Japan Fisheries Association openly oppose this, that the protection of the marine environment is everyone's responsibility, no one can be harmed because of interests.
The Fisheries Association believes that this is harming the Japanese fishery, which has a significant impact on the image of the entire Japanese marine brand, if the wastewater is diluted and discharged into the sea, there must be problems with the natural environment, South Korea and other neighboring countries believe that this is an irresponsibility, and the staff of the South Korean Ministry of Technology has asked the International Atomic Energy Agency to fully investigate the water quality.
South Korea has publicly stated that the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant pollutes the water, once it enters the ocean, it will definitely lead to the spread of radioactive tritium elements, which is a major blow to the ocean and fish, and for us humans themselves, it is also the case of the city gate fire, we are all fish in the pool, we must consider the environment, the nuclear power plant is currently hoarding almost 123 tons of nuclear sewage, 2022 will be filled, before this will definitely be solved.
And Japan wants to dilute and discharge into the ocean plan, is expected to start running in the fall of 2022, at least a few decades, more than 1,000 water tanks according to the time period began to discharge, for many years the sewage treatment debate has been endless, in fact, many people advocate the construction of more water storage tanks, first saved, and Japan finally decided to discharge it to the nearby Pacific Ocean, triggering many people in the country to oppose.
In 9 years, there is only one bad idea, why should the ocean pay for human errors? Japan has said it will promote other products from Fukushima to give fishermen more ways to make a living, and who consumer will dare to eat seafood here in the future? Global environmental groups strongly oppose this move as a huge threat to the marine environment, and the consequences cannot be predicted.
1.23 million tons of water stored in 1044 tanks, the amount of wastewater increased by 170 tons per day, the water treatment system could not filter out tritium, if it was diluted in the nuclear power plant to reduce by 40 times it would take 30 years, it is clear that the upper layers of Japan can not wait, the amount of wastewater is increasing, has been overloaded, and they have no intention of building new water storage equipment, this decision is unpopular.