It was almost the New Year, and my aunt and husband said in the WeChat group that they wanted to cut us
Some people say that the old man is eccentric, and it is best to divide it according to the proportion of capital contribution. Taking away half of it is not outrageous, of course, legally it is the property of the elderly, how to distribute it is no problem, but the consequences may also be quite serious.
Of course, many people also have prejudices, only look at the 5w funding, analyze it, the original text bugs a lot. At least one case lz family has the right to want more. The door-to-door son-in-law and the actual pension, (but the original text said four children, also called grandfather), the public order and good customs say that the door-to-door son-in-law should inherit the big head.
Welfare rooms, the actual value is not only 8w. Those who have not experienced it may not understand, similar to the original shares now, send 1w shares, and then you can buy 8w shares, one share at a time. After the listing, it experienced a sharp rise to 100 shares. This cannot be made in proportion to the capital contribution. In a similar situation, I have also seen demolition, and one of the two brothers snatched his parents' household registration book and bought all the moves under his own name to fight a lawsuit. It can't be justified just because it's funded. The right way is to take advantage of the old man's life to fight the lawsuit.
