laitimes

The host sent an article to satirize Han Hong: wearing 4 million watches on his hand, but shouting that the donation is bankrupt, how to evaluate? I would like to say that this host really has no pattern, and this host's statement is not correct

The host sent an article to satirize Han Hong: wearing 4 million watches on his hand, but shouting that the donation is bankrupt, how to evaluate?

I would like to say that this host really has no pattern, and this host's statement is not correct. Because Han Hong has donated a lot of money on various occasions, which is obvious to everyone, is it impossible to wear a watch because of donations? Is it because of donations to reduce your quality of life?

The donations of celebrities have always been a hot topic of discussion, among which the enthusiastic public welfare stars represented by Han Hong have also done a lot of practical things for the society. However, some people are not accustomed to others doing good things, they have not contributed to society, and they always want to "provoke things", which is really very speechless.

Han Hong's donation was questioned

After the outbreak of the epidemic, Han Hong and her fund team have been busy with donations to the epidemic area, and almost all donations and materials are open and transparent, and some people still question Han Hong and her team.

As soon as this news came out, it also attracted everyone's attention. Everyone expressed their belief in Han Hong and patiently waited for the results of the investigation of the relevant departments. Sima 3 was also attacked by everyone, and some people still felt that this person did not want to rub the heat, and wanted to be crazy.

Later, the investigation of the relevant departments also knew, and the official also gave a proof, although Han Hong's foundation did have some non-compliance in some places, but on the whole it was very standardized, so it proved the innocence of Han Hong and her foundation. Sure enough, Han Hong did not disappoint everyone.

The host sent an article to satirize Han Hong: wearing 4 million watches on his hands, but shouting that the donation was bankrupt

However, there is another famous host who wants to expose Han Hong's shortness, this famous host has hosted a fight match, his name is Zheng Huanyu. Zheng Huanyu forwarded an article by a netizen on the social platform, saying that Han Hong was wearing a 4 million watch on his hand, suspected of implying that Han Hong had done charity to achieve the point of "ruining his family".

As everyone may know, Han Hong once said in an interview that she donated money to charity until she was about to go bankrupt. But now it has been pulled out that once brought 4 million famous watches, which is equivalent to wearing a luxury car in his hand, which gives Zheng Huanyu and some others ridicule Han Hong.

My assessment of the matter

In this regard, I would like to say that Han Hong is a public figure, she is a singer, and she has her own legitimate profession. People will make money and be enthusiastic about public welfare, whether it is wearing a watch or driving a luxury car, as long as it is obtained through their own efforts and legitimate means, the money they earn is spent by themselves, and they do not steal and do not rob, what is not possible?

And Han Hong has been very enthusiastic about public welfare over the years, many times there are some natural disasters in the country, Han Hong and her foundation will find a way to help, and Han Hong is often personally involved, and many times you can see Han Hong busy in the disaster area.

It is such a person full of positive energy, there are people who question and slander her, then in this society, will there be good people desperate to help others? We should promote positive energy, not question people who are eager to do good.

The host sent an article to satirize Han Hong: wearing 4 million watches on his hand, but shouting that the donation is bankrupt, how to evaluate? I would like to say that this host really has no pattern, and this host's statement is not correct

Read on