Introduction: The two-year-long U.S. extradition of Meng Wanzhou case ushered in a key judgment in Canada, and whether the HSBC bank documents can be used as evidence will change the outcome of the entire case.
Since Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou was arrested at a Canadian airport two years ago, the case in which the United States asked Canada to extradite Meng Wanzhou to the United States for trial has been heard in Canada, and now this case is ushering in an important key verdict.
Meng Wanzhou's legal team earlier obtained court support in Hong Kong to obtain HSBC documents, and Meng Wanzhou's legal team said: According to the documents submitted by HSBC, the relevant evidence submitted by the United States on Meng Wanzhou's fraud of HSBC bank is not accurate and sufficient, especially HSBC's relationship with Huawei and Starcom, and HSBC's senior management's loan to Huawei to conduct business in Iran, there are major omissions in the "Case Record" submitted by the US side.
Meng Wanzhou's legal team believes that the adequacy of evidence is the core link of the extradition case and the necessary link related to whether to carry out extradition. If the judge allows the content of Meng Wanzhou's lawyer's application to become evidence for the next stage of the trial, it is possible that in the next stage of the trial, the judge will find that the US extradition request is not supported by sufficient evidence, and then order the extradition procedure to be terminated.
It is reported that in the two days of court trials on June 29 and 30, the core content was whether the judge allowed or allowed the defense lawyers to submit what they could be used as evidence for the next stage of the trial. The verdict is expected to be made in early July. In early August, the court will hold another session on whether to carry out extradition.
For Meng Wanzhou's case, the whole world is very clear, the whole case is a political case, the United States used to blackmail Huawei company only chips, and Canada is an accomplice role in the whole process, now it depends on whether the Canadian judges insist on the law or just because of the alliance between Canada and the United States to make a judgment favorable to the United States.
Now that the Meng Wanzhou case has ushered in a key judgment, I sincerely hope that the court can rule that the HSBC documents can become important evidence, which will help the trial of the Meng Wanzhou case, even if the final result is not as desired, at least let the world know how the United States and HSBC framed Meng Wanzhou, let us praise Meng Wanzhou, really a hero.