In the 26th round of the CBA regular season, the North Control men's basketball team lost to the Liaoning men's basketball team 80-85, although the north control has been suppressed by Liaoning, but in the last moments of the game staged a counterattack war, almost reversed success. Now the referee report on this game has come out, the report shows that the referee in the last two minutes had two wrongful judgments, both of which were unfavorable to the North Control team, and this time was the most fierce moment for North Control to chase points, it is no exaggeration to say that the two misjudgments stifled the reversal of North Control to a certain extent, and Marbury lost this game a bit unjustly.
In this game, the North Control team performed well, the first quarter of the game they took the lead in the attack, so that the Liaoning men's basketball team only got 19 points, while they led by 22 points 3 points, but with the deepening of the game, especially in the second quarter, the third quarter, the Liaoning men's basketball team gradually controlled the rhythm with its own strength, Liaoning also achieved a score reversal, once leading the North Control to reach 15 points, but the North Control side has not given up, until the last moment of the game, they also trailed the opponent by 10 points 70-80, but in the last few minutes, Beikong played a small 10-2 climax, chasing the score to 80:82, just 2 points behind Liaoning, and at this critical moment, there were two key misjudgments on the field.
From the official referee report, it can be seen that in the last two minutes, the referee made two wrong judgments, that is, when there were 29.9 seconds left in the game, Liaoning men's basketball team Yu Zechen defended the North Control foreign aid Landsberg when there was an intrusion foul, but the referee on duty did not say, in addition, when there were 26.8 seconds left in the game, when the Liaoning men's basketball team Guo Allen advanced from the backcourt, the ball and the ball carrier's feet did not fully enter the Liaoning team's front court within 8 seconds, and should be judged to be 8 seconds of violation, but the referee on duty still did not say. These two key misjudgments have made Beijing's persistence ineffective.
Putting aside Guo Allen's 8-second violation, let's say that Yu Zechen's foul on Landsberg at 29.9 seconds, the score at that time was 80-82, and North Control was 2 points behind, as can be seen from the score column, the Liaoning men's basketball team was full at that time, if the referee could make the correct decision at that time, then Landsberg would have to execute the penalty, it is likely to equalize the score, there will be no Guo Allen counterattack on the basket, the score that may have been 82-82 was changed to 80-84, the gap between 4 points before and after. And if at this time, Beijing Control can draw, the game time is still 29.9 seconds, even if the Liaoning men's basketball team can complete the attack in 24 seconds, it will also leave North Control with a deadly or equal time, and the result of the game is really difficult to say.
Therefore, the misjudgment in the last moment of this game has a direct impact on the outcome of the game, but the helpless thing is that the result of the game cannot be changed, and Marbury's loss this time is indeed a bit unjust. Not daring to blow the whistle easily at critical moments is also a big problem for CBA referees, this is not the first time this has happened, it is right to give more attention to the players in the decisive moment, but if there is an obvious foul, the referee still has to stand up and take responsibility. Nothing, adjournment!