laitimes

Is this credible?

author:Fly

Some people say: Don't take love as all.

Some people say: if you want to make "former" angels, tomorrow you will be an upstart.

With the attitude of trying it out, all the way, all the way, it seems that the first sentence of someone said is completely correct.

Because, slowly, you will eventually lose love, lose to family affection.

So I firmly believe that the second sentence of someone is also correct, so I have always regarded "qian" as a goddess, all the way, all the way looking forward to becoming an upstart, but ten years have passed, "qian" is still my goddess, high above, out of reach, I still have the same original intention, eager to have him, but he has not been willing to intersect with me.

At the same time, my classmates had angels, but in the end he was left with angels, no love, no affection, and then he cried and said everywhere that angels would transform into demons, eat affection, and it was demons who harmed him and had no affection.

Money is an angel, money that satisfies your normal needs is an angel, money is also a devil, money that satisfies your desires is the devil, and human feelings are the strongest, lightest and truest.

Do you think that the second sentence of someone is correct or incorrect?