In recent years, as soon as the state implements the welfare subsidy policy, some people will use the facts to "correct" the implementation of the subsidy. Many grassroots cadres with strong selfish desires will collect subsidies into their own pockets, and then use meager funds to disperse them to "related households," resulting in an increasingly serious situation of "the people's belief in officials." Especially in the countryside, which happens to be a place away from the hustle and bustle, many sneaky things can be done more and more seriously. For example, the state's support for the economic life of the peasants cannot always be implemented in place, and the reasons for this are self-explanatory.
After the mainland has been comprehensively lifted out of poverty and entered the era of rural revitalization, the state has formulated a guarantee and support measure - the dynamic monitoring mechanism of minimum guarantee in order to ensure that farmers will no longer return to poverty and become poor. This mechanism has been established in many areas, using big data to monitor rural low-income people, and giving the scope of guarantee for low-income support after learning the facts through door-to-door visits. It is worth mentioning here that once the actual situation of the farmer is true, it will be included in the category of "full guarantee", which effectively ensures the livelihood and economic resources of the poor peasants.
The implementation of this "new mechanism" will be implemented in every village, and there are members of the village committee to monitor the living conditions of the villagers, as long as they meet the standards, they can submit applications and receive subsidies. Everyone has noticed that "should be guaranteed to the fullest" is limited in scope, limited to these three categories of people: 1, people with income, but belonging to special hardship households; 2, people with major diseases and unable to obtain income on their own; 3, people with severe disabilities.
It is not difficult to find that the rural low-income population generally belongs to the majority, followed by severely disabled people, patients with severe diseases and special hardship cases. No one wants families to be so depressed, but the reality is that it will be cruel to the state if they do not give them a modest subsidy when they are not able to create their own economic value and increase their income. Therefore, I think that the establishment of the dynamic monitoring mechanism of the minimum guarantee not only provides help for the poor villagers in rural areas, but also shines hope in their hearts.
According to the current speed of social development on the mainland, as well as the speed of price increases, in the next few years or more than ten years, there will be a high probability of big movements, big development, people need more and more expenditure, if you do not alleviate the plight of rural families, the consequences will be unimaginable! Of course, while the mechanism is implemented and the subsidies are in place, it is also necessary to strengthen and improve the moral quality of cadres and avoid the undesirable phenomenon of "insatiable greed."