"Fengtai market supervision" news, Beijing Fengtai District issued a notice on the recent food safety inspection of the catering industry food safety problems in catering stores.
1. At Beijing Changshenglimin Snack Bar, the parties concerned failed to establish and comply with the purchase inspection record system in accordance with the regulations, violating the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 53 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and were given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (3) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
2. Beijing Danjiang Yuyan Catering Co., Ltd., the party concerned failed to formulate and implement the production and business process control requirements in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 55 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of article 28, paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and article 126, paragraph 1, item (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
3. Beijing Fenglizhang Trading Co., Ltd., the parties concerned failed to formulate and implement the production and business process control requirements in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of article 33, paragraph 1, item (2) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and gave an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of article 28, paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and article 126, paragraph 1, item (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
4. Beijing Huagui Fuyuan Catering Management Co., Ltd., the party's failure to establish and comply with the purchase inspection record system in accordance with the regulations violated the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 53 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (3) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
5. Beijing Jiashengju Restaurant, the party's failure to establish and comply with the purchase inspection record system in accordance with the regulations violated the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 53 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (3) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
6. At Beijing Jiataile Lao Duck Soup Hot Pot Restaurant, the parties concerned failed to establish and comply with the purchase inspection record system in accordance with the regulations, which violated the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 53 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and gave the administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of article 28, paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and article 126, paragraph 1 , item (3) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
7. Beijing Jingyomen Catering Co., Ltd., the party's failure to regularly maintain, clean and calibrate catering service facilities and equipment in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of article 56, paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of article 28, paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and article 126, paragraph 1, item (5) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
8. Beijing No. 9 Heizhu Sports Club Co., Ltd., the parties concerned failed to formulate and implement the production and business process control requirements in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of Article 33, Paragraph 1, Item (2) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and gave an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
9. Beijing Li Ji Ling Bone Catering Management Co., Ltd., the party arranged for a person who has not obtained a health certificate to engage in the work of contacting food for direct consumption, which violated the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 45 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Item (6) of Article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
10. Beijing Longyunmai Catering Co., Ltd., the party's failure to regularly maintain, clean and calibrate catering service facilities and equipment in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 56 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of article 28, paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and item (5) of the first paragraph of article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
11. Beijing Longyueju Catering Management Co., Ltd., the party's failure to regularly maintain, clean and calibrate catering service facilities and equipment in accordance with the regulations violated the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 56 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Item (5) of Article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
12. The Xiaotun Road Branch of Beijing Niuduo Catering Management Co., Ltd., the parties concerned failed to formulate and implement the production and business process control requirements in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of Article 33, Paragraph 1, Item (2) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and gave an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
13. Beijing Cattlesmith Quansheng Catering Management Co., Ltd., the party's failure to establish and comply with the purchase inspection record system in accordance with the regulations violated the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 53 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (3) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
14. Beijing Qingmuyuan Catering Management Center, the parties engaged in food business activities beyond the business scope specified in the license, violated the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 8 of the "Beijing Municipal Provisions on the Administration of Small-scale Food Production and Operation", and were given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Paragraph 2 of Article 24 of the Beijing Municipal Provisions on the Administration of Small-scale Food Production and Operation.
15. Beijing Santa Febei Catering Co., Ltd., the party's failure to regularly maintain, clean and calibrate catering service facilities and equipment in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of Article 56, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1(5) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
16. Beijing Hongfushun Catering Co., Ltd., the party's failure to establish and comply with the purchase inspection record system in accordance with the regulations violated the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 53 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (3) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
17. Beijing Shunfuxiang Sheep Scorpion Catering Co., Ltd., the party concerned arranged for a person who has not obtained a health certificate to engage in the work of contacting food for direct consumption, which violated the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 45 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of article 28, paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and article 126, paragraph 1, item (6) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
18. Beijing Silk Road Tuoyuan Catering Co., Ltd., the parties concerned failed to formulate and implement the production and business process control requirements in accordance with the regulations, violating the provisions of article 33, paragraph 1, item (2) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and were given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of article 28, paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and article 126, paragraph 1, item (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
19. Beijing Sifang Yihe Catering Service Co., Ltd., the party concerned failed to formulate and implement the production and business process control requirements in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of article 33, paragraph 1, item (2) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and gave an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of article 28, paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and article 126, paragraph 1, item (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
20. Beijing Tedeyi Catering Service Co., Ltd., the parties concerned failed to formulate and implement the production and business process control requirements in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of Article 33, Paragraph 1, Item (2) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and gave an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
21. Beijing Future Pinchuang Catering Service Co., Ltd., the parties concerned changed the licensing matters specified in the food business license, and the food business operator did not apply for the change of the business license in accordance with the regulations, violating the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 27 of the Measures for the Administration of Food Business Licenses, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 49, Paragraph 1 of the Measures for the Administration of Food Business Licenses.
22. The act of the parties not washing or disinfecting tableware, drinking utensils and containers containing food for direct consumption before use violates the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 56 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and is given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Item (5) of article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
23. Beijing Fresh Frog Fang Catering Management Co., Ltd., the parties concerned failed to formulate and implement the production and business process control requirements in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 55 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and gave the administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1 (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
24. Beijing Zhendima Catering Co., Ltd., the party's failure to regularly maintain, clean and calibrate catering service facilities and equipment in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 56 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 28 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and the first paragraph (5) of Article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
25. Beijing Zhinacheng Catering Co., Ltd., the party's failure to regularly maintain, clean and calibrate catering service facilities and equipment in accordance with the regulations, violated the provisions of Article 56, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and was given an administrative penalty of warning in accordance with the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 126, Paragraph 1, Item (5) of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
26. The court crispy beef cake (Shi Enyan), the conduct of the small restaurant of the parties to engage in food production and business activities without obtaining a license, violated the provisions of Article 10 of the Beijing Municipal Regulations on the Administration of Small-scale Food Production and Operation, and according to the provisions of The first paragraph of Article 22 of the Beijing Municipal Regulations on the Administration of Small-scale Food Production and Operation, the case is under investigation.
27. Mai Duo and Baking Pie (Zhang Yan), the small restaurant of the parties concerned did not obtain a license to engage in food production and business activities, violating the provisions of Article 10 of the Beijing Municipal Regulations on the Administration of Small-scale Food Production and Operation, and the case is under investigation in accordance with the provisions of Article 22, Paragraph 1 of the Beijing Municipal Provisions on the Administration of Small-scale Food Production and Operation.
28. Beijing Chuange Catering Management Service Co., Ltd. South Third Ring West Road Branch, there is a problem of kitchen hygiene dead end, ordered to immediately correct it.
29. Beijing Funiutang Catering Culture Co., Ltd. South Third Ring West Road store, there is a problem of kitchen hygiene dead ends, ordered to immediately correct it.
30. The Jiaomen Branch of Burger King (Beijing) Catering Management Co., Ltd. has a problem with the dead corner of kitchen hygiene, and orders it to correct it immediately.