laitimes

Dwarf oil ~ how now any cat and dog can be a journalist!

Yesterday to write an article a little anxious, collected about Yang Tun's information is not much, this time to understand this so-called reporter, I only have one feeling: dwarf oil ~ how now what cats and dogs can be journalists!

Recently, some stories about the controversial actions in the CBA League have gradually cooled down, but on January 19, Beijing reporter Yang Tun used the recent example of the Guangdong Hongyuan team to tell the legal hidden dangers behind the controversy, and the reporter also named Guangdong Hongyuan players Hu Mingxuan, Zeng Fanri, and Weems, believing that if the injurious action was identified as intentional injury, he would face imprisonment.

In the CBA arena, there are actually many phenomena of hurting the opposing players because of irregular movements, and Yang Cat directly named guangdong players, and its subjective intention is self-evident. Yang Tun himself is a reporter and basketball commentator of the Beijing team, and the contradictions and grudges between the Beijing team and the players and fans of the Guangdong team and even the media reports are very many, which also leads yang tun to add a lot of subjective ideas in the process of writing articles. Why talk about the legal ethics behind the CBA controversy and ignore the malicious fouls that have occurred before Marbury, Wang Xiaohui and other players? Why is it that when Marbury and Wang Xiaohui caused a second conflict over foul problems, Yang Tun did not come out to point out the country and sprinkle pen and ink? Got it.

Dwarf oil ~ how now any cat and dog can be a journalist!

Speaking of Yang Tun, many Guangdong fans said that they had doubted the article written by Yang Tun himself as early as a few years ago, as a well-known media author who recruited blacks for the home team, the basketball commentary and basketball programs he participated in had published remarks smearing other teams, and his good teammate, Wang Su of the Daily Express, was also notorious for publishing false news and not objective news.

In my opinion, when Yang Tun maliciously criticizes and accuses Guangdong players, his subjective intention is more inclined to provoke contradictions between Liaoning and Guangdong fans. Both sides of Liaoning and Guangdong have suffered personnel damage in the game, and there is a deep contradiction in itself, and this wave of rhythm is simply dry firewood meets fire, making Guangdong fans and Liaoning fans quarrel in the major media on the Internet.

Although the Beijing team has the news of heavy reinforcements, the club has also increased the investment of funds in order to compete for the championship, it is a pity that the Beijing Shougang team has been eliminated by the Guangdong team in the playoffs for two consecutive seasons, and the championship is far away, that is, this breath has nowhere to release, coupled with the fact that the Beijing team is currently ranked ninth in the standings with 14 wins and 10 losses this season, the results are not ideal than the Guangdong team, the playoff seats are not necessarily stable, Yang Tun, Wang Suo and other media people if they only write their own home team articles, may even be a problem.

Dwarf oil ~ how now any cat and dog can be a journalist!

I have to say that Yang Tun's tricks are very clever. First of all, he subjectively characterized Weems's layup action as a malicious foul, with extremely sinister intentions, provoking right and wrong, causing controversy. Regardless of his basketball expertise, on-field penalties should be handed over to the referees, not the players and journalists. In fact, I would like to question yang tun's face: Since you are so nosy, why did you turn a blind eye to Han Dejun's behavior of getting up and trying to retaliate against Weems after Weems had already been convicted of violating the body? Why turn a blind eye to the insults of Liaoning fans to Guangdong foreign aid after the game? Are you polite! Are you really objective!

Secondly, Yang Tun repeatedly mentioned the professional term "malicious foul", in fact, in addition to Zeng Fanri's goal is indeed not very rational, other players, including Hu Mingxuan and Weems, their actions in the process of travel, even the Beijing media giants Su Qun and Yang Yi dare not pack a ticket to be sure that it is a malicious foul, and even the basis for the referee to punish Hu Mingxuan for violating the physical foul is not very clear, to put it bluntly, it is insufficient evidence. Why is the fact that big V is not sure, this kind of little journalist who has little visibility and has a very prominent subjective tendency, will be so sure that it is a malicious foul that must rise to the level of law? Got it.

Article 1176 of the Civil Code for the first time stipulates in the form of a legal provision that self-responsibility is a reason for exemption from liability, that is, "if the victim voluntarily participates in cultural and sports activities with certain risks and is harmed by the acts of other participants, the victim shall not request other participants to bear tort liability; except if other participants have intentional or gross negligence in the occurrence of damages."

Basketball is a competitive sport, with the characteristics of confrontation, the probability of physical contact between team members in the fast-track shooting, defense and rush sports is extremely high, in the fierce confrontational sports, it is difficult to require the actor to go through the brain's careful consideration every time before making the next action. Therefore, the collision injury caused by routine physical contact in basketball is a common phenomenon, adults participating in basketball activities should have a certain degree of foresight of the risks that may occur in this sports activity, athletes participating in competition training, but also voluntary participation in training, so for the training and competition process caused by physical collisions caused by the damage should be their own responsibility.

Dwarf oil ~ how now any cat and dog can be a journalist!

Finally, and more importantly, Yang Tun's mind is scheming. The time of the article was published on January 19, so to speak, the time point at which Yang Tun chose to publish the article was very exquisite. The Liaoyue competition has come to an end, the fans of the two sides after arguing for a while, but also slowly began to calm down, and when the Guangdong team once again appeared unfavorable public opinion, he jumped out - because of Zeng Fanri's foul, because Zhao Yanhao's two teeth were knocked out, Guangdong further fell into the quagmire of unfavorable public opinion, he jumped out.

First, there is a possibility that Weems and Hu Mingxuan's foul actions are unintentional, and then it is pointed out that Zeng Fanri's behavior is not easy to sophistry into unintentional behavior. This set of words has ignited the anger of Guangdong fans, what is sophistry? No is wrong is not right, for Zeng Fanri's behavior, many Guangdong fans have not refuted it because of this, I am not biased in favor of Zeng Fanri, his irrational foul is indeed the wrong choice. The so-called "sophistry" is exactly the situation that Yang Tun hopes to achieve and see - this is what he thinks in his heart!

About the quotation of a professional coach that Yang Tun was looking for, this is related to the player's personal ability and playing environment. There is nothing wrong with this sentence itself, but in the article, the implied message that the players have "malicious fouls" on the field is related to the team's players themselves and the training environment. It is undeniable that the Guangdong team has indeed had some unnecessary fouls in recent years, but all the club members, whether it is the coaching staff or players, or the staff, do not want their players and opponents to have personnel injuries. As the head coach of the national team, Du Feng injured the excellent players of other teams, which was not conducive to his selection, employment and platooning in international competitions. When the Guangdong team is training, the youth team head coach Qu Shaobin guidance is repeatedly emphasized that the action is clean and compliant, we start from the young players, the action is standardized, in the event of conflict, keep a clear mind, reduce irrational behavior. ——We can see on the field that when the Guangdong players' movements are too big to collide with the opponent, they often lift the opponent up at the first time, say sorry, and even head coach Du Feng went forward to comfort Han Dejun when Weems was beaten.

Injuries are irreparable, the facts have happened, and we can only accept the results and try our best to make up for our mistakes.

As a Guangdong fan, I also hope that Guangdong players can reduce unnecessary fouls and leave a good impression on the referee, so as to reduce controversial penalties. Otherwise, when there is a dispute and punishment, the referee will give you an impression score long ago, preconceived, why should you argue with others?

Here, I also hope that all the players in the CBA are healthy, and I also hope that fans will not be taken by such cat and dog reporters to spoil the rhythm.

"Guangdong Hongyuan Tournament Review" provides a platform for Guangdong Hongyuan basketball fans to communicate, interact and jointly support the Guangdong men's basketball team. As the "sixth person" of the Guangdong men's basketball team, Guangdong fans will always support and pay attention to the development of the Guangdong men's basketball team and Chinese basketball. We sincerely hope to contribute a little strength to the development of China's basketball cause and contribute to the development of mass sports! Fans who like and support the Guangdong men's basketball team should quickly point out a concern about it

Read on